Skip to content

SYMPHONY 1020-50-428SRecalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · SYMPHONY OCT SYSTEM CORTICAL FIX POLYAXIAL SCREW REDUCTION CANNULATED Diameter 4.0 Rod, 5.0X28mm 3.5 4.0 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of SYMPHONY (113)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705034525143), received between Jan 27, 2026 and Jan 27, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Compatibility Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Compatibility Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 27, 2026Compatibility Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR CERVICAL DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION(TH1) FOR OPLL ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE SURGERY, WITH THE NAVIGATION DRIVER, NAVIGATION SLEEVE, AND SRI HEAD HOLDING SLEEVE ASSEMBLED, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO INSERT THE SCREW STRAIGHT. INSERTION UNDER THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM WAS ABANDONED AND A STANDARD SCREWDRIVER WAS USED. AFTER CONFIRMING THE MISALIGNMENT WITH AN O-ARM, THE SCREW WAS REINSERTED. [OCCURRENCE] THE INSERTION METHOD AND SIZE WERE CONFIRMED PREOPERATIVELY, AND THE SCREW WAS SELECTED FOR TH1. AFTER DEPLOYMENT, THE NAVIGATION ANTENNA WAS INSTALLED AND AN O-ARM IMAGE WAS TAKEN. AFTER CREATING THE SCREW PATH WITH TH1, THE SCREW WAS ATTACHED TO THE NAVIGATION DRIVER, BUT DUE TO POOR FIT, IT TOOK TIME, AND INSERTION UNDER THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM WAS ABANDONED. AFTER INSERTING WITH A STANDARD SCREWDRIVER, THE SCREW WAS REINSERTED AFTER CONFIRMING THE MISALIGNMENT WITH AN O-ARM. THE TAB ON THE LEFT SIDE DID NOT BREAK, BUT THE STANDARD SCREW WAS UNSEALED AND REINSERTED. [RESPONSE] THE RIGHT-SIDE REDUCTION SCREW WAS REINSERTED UNDER THE NAVIGATION SYSTEM AFTER BREAKING THE TAB. THE TAB ON THE LEFT SIDE DID NOT BREAK, SO A STANDARD SCREW WAS USED AND

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24189612 ↗

Other Posterior cervical screw system devices

All Posterior cervical screw system devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page