NA 03.611.019Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 9.0MM BROKEN SCREW REMOVER · Class 1
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10705034713823), received between Apr 20, 2017 and Apr 20, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Jam1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 20, 2017Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED WITH A T10-PELVIS CONSTRUCT USING DEPUY SPINE IMPLANTS. THE DATE OF THE INITIAL SURGERY IS NOT KNOWN. ON UNKNOWN DATE IT WAS DISCOVERED PATIENT HAD A BROKEN ROD AND WAS RETURNED TO SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. DURING THE REVISION, THE RODS BELOW THE L2 SCREWS WERE REMOVED, AS WERE THE L3,L4,L5,S1 AND SACRAL-ALAR-ILIAC (SAI)SCREWS BILATERALLY. ALL OF THE SCREWS CAME OUT WITH EASE. DURING INSERTION OF THE NEW SAI SCREWS, ONE OF THE SCREWS GOT STUCK ABOUT THREE QUARTERS OF THE WAY INSERTED. THE SURGEON THEN ATTEMPTED TO BACK OUT THE SCREW ENTIRELY. HE TRIED TO USE AN 8.0 MM SCREW REMOVER BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE SURGEON THEN DECIDED TO CUT OFF THE POLYAXIAL HEAD FROM THE SCREW AND USED A PAIR OF TREPHINES AND SYNTHES FEMALE EASY-OUTS. AFTER ABOUT 10 MINUTES AND A LOT OF FORCE, THE SURGEON WAS FINALLY ABLE TO BACK OUT THE SCREW USING THE 9MM SCREW REMOVER. HOWEVER, THE SCREW BECAME STUCK INSIDE THE SCREW REMOVER. WITH THE BROKEN SCREW AND ALL FRAGMENTS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO IMPLANT THE SAME TYPE OF SCREW. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. BROKEN ROD AND REVISION SURGERY CAPTURED
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6508475 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page