Skip to content

ARROW IPN921177Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · Super Arrow-Flex(R) Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Set with Integral Hemostasis Valve/Side Port · Class 2

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10801902201123), received between May 25, 2026 and May 25, 2026 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 25, 2026Material Integrity Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, "DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE OPERATING PHYSICIAN OBSERVED THAT THE DILATOR WAS "CUT OFF"." THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT INJURY, HARM, OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS REPORTED AS "FINE". NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION WAS REPORTED BEYOND REMOVAL OF THE AFFECTED DEVICE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY FOLLOWING REPLACEMENT WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. GOOD FAITH EFFORTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE REPORTED DEVICE ISSUE. A TOTAL OF THREE DOCUMENTED ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO CONTACT THE USER FACILITY; HOWEVER, NO RESPONSE OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25271682 ↗

Other Introducer, catheter devices

All Introducer, catheter devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.