Axonics 2201Recalls & reported problems
Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. · Tined Lead · Class 3 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10810005340158), received between Feb 28, 2020 and Mar 12, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration4
- Failure to Read Input Signal1
- Impedance Problem1
- Material Erosion1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant3
- Erosion1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Pain1
- Therapeutic Response, Decreased1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 12, 2024Migration; Migration
THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LEAD MIGRATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 18887139 ↗MalfunctionJun 18, 2020Migration; Migration
PATIENT HAD A MASSAGE DONE. THE MASSAGE SESSION INCLUDED THE AREA OF THE IPG (NEUROSTIMULATOR) AND TINED LEAD INSERTION SITE. PATIENT WAS NOT RECEIVING EFFECTIVE THERAPY. X-RAYS WERE PERFORMED AND RESULTS SHOW THE LEAD HAD MIGRATED INWARD. THE PATIENT DECIDED TO HAVE THE SYSTEM EXPLANTED DUE TO RECOVERY TIME FOR A LEAD REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Therapeutic Response, Decreased
MAUDE report 10171467 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2020Migration; Migration
PATIENT'S LEAD MOVED AFTER THEIR FINAL IMPLANT. REVISION SURGERY NEEDED TO REPLACE THE LEAD.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 10146497 ↗MalfunctionMay 8, 2020Material Erosion; Material Erosion
PATIENT UNDERWENT A RAPID WEIGHT LOSS PROGRAM WHERE THEY HAD LOST 38 POUNDS IN 2 MONTHS. THE DOCTOR STATED THE LEAD STRESS COIL AT THE IPG (NEUROSTIMULATOR) SITE HAD ERODED THROUGH THE SKIN. THE PATIENT WAS SCHEDULED FOR A FULL SYSTEM EXPLANT ON (B)(6) 2020.
Patient problems: Erosion
MAUDE report 10039444 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2020Failure to Read Input Signal; Impedance Problem; Failure to Read Input Signal; Impedance Problem
WHEN THE LEAD STIMULATION CABLE WAS ATTACHED TO THE TINED LEAD, THE IMPEDANCE OF ALL 4 CONTACTS CAME UP AS OPEN IN RED AND THE CABLE WAS UNABLE TO READ THE THRESHOLDS FOR EACH CONTACT. THE NEEDLE TEST STIMULATION CABLE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9941486 ↗MalfunctionFeb 28, 2020Migration; Migration
SEE SECTION H, NUMBER 6, EVENT PROBLEM AND EVALUATION CODES.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 9772183 ↗
Other Implanted Electrical Device Intended For Treatment Of Fecal Incontinence devices
- InterStim™ X 97800Medtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence5,930 reports
- INTERSTIM® II 3058Medtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence990 reports
- Axonics 1201Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. · Implanted Electrical Device Intended For Treatment Of Fecal Incontinence481 reports
- InterStim™ Micro SureScan™ MRI 97810Medtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence50 reports
- NA TH90QFAMedtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence1 recall0 reports
- Axonics 1701Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. · Implanted Electrical Device Intended For Treatment Of Fecal Incontinence31 reports
- Verify™ 353101Medtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence29 reports
- Verify® 353101Medtronic, Inc. · Implanted electrical device intended for treatment of fecal incontinence24 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.