Zilver Vena G57437Recalls & reported problems
Cook Ireland Ltd · Zilver Vena, Venous Self-Expanding Stent · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Zilver Vena (19)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002574370), received between Sep 15, 2021 and Sep 16, 2021 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove1
- Off-Label Use1
Patient problems
- Stroke/CVA2
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 16, 2021Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION ON THE 29-OCT AND THE DEVICE EVALUATION ON THE 14-OCT-2021.
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA; Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 12480275 ↗InjurySep 15, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER: ((B)(4)) "UPON REMOVAL, THE DEVICE GOT STUCK ON THE WIRE. THE PHYSICIAN PULLED (AND WHEN HE PULLED) - IT BROKE THE INNER CATHETER OFF. IT WAS NOT REALIZED THE INNER CATHETER WAS BROKEN-OFF. THE PHYSICIAN GOT THE DEVICE OFF THE WIRE AND ATTEMPTED TO PUT A BALLOON OVER THE WIRE AND THE BALLOON GOT STUCK AT THE SAME POINT WHERE THE STENT GOT STUCK (OUTSIDE OF THE BODY). THE PHYSICIAN TOOK THE BALLOON OFF AND TRIED TO DO THE SAME THING WITH A 6FR CORDIS MPA AND THAT ALSO GOT STUCK AT THE SAME PLACE ON THE WIRE (THIS STILL OCCURRED OUTSIDE THE BODY). THEN, THE PHYSICIAN WENT IN WITH A 6FR GUIDE (WHICH HAS A LARGER LUMEN), THIS DID PASS THE DIFFICULT LOCATION ON THE WIRE. ONCE HE HAD THE GUIDE DOWN HE REMOVED THE COMPLAINT WIRE AND ATTEMPTED A WIRE EXCHANGE, BUT THE WIRE WOULD NOT GO ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE GUIDE. A THIS POINT, THE ENTIRE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED (REMOVING THE GUIDE AND THE WIRE AS WELL). LATER, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND OUT THE INNER CATHETER OF THE STENTS' DELIVERY WAS STILL LODGED INSIDE THE GUIDE. THE PHYSICIAN CUT THE INNER LUMEN LOOKING FOR PIECES. ((B)(4)) - AT THIS POINT HE REGAINED HIS ACCESS WITH A NEW STENT AND THE NEW STENT DEPLOYED FIN
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 12473604 ↗
Other Stent, iliac vein devices
- Abre™ AB9U14080090Medtronic, Inc. · Stent, iliac vein2 recalls9 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall55 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14080Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall36 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall33 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14140Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall31 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14100Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall30 reports
- Venovo® VENUM16120Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall29 reports
- Venovo® VENUM14160Angiomed GmbH & Co. Medizintechnik KG · Stent, iliac vein1 recall27 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page