PRONTO IPN913539Recalls & reported problems
Teleflex Incorporated · Pronto LP, 6F · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10841156100315), received between Jun 22, 2022 and Jul 11, 2022 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Separation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 11, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
AS REPORTED: IN THE PCI PROCEDURE, THE THROMBUS WAS AT AROUND PROXIMAL MIDDLE OF LAD, 6F, 3.0 GUIDING CATHETER, GUIDE WIRE AND 6FPRONTO LP WERE USED TO REMOVE THE THROMBUS. AFTER THE THROMBUS WAS EXTRACTED, ON THE DEVICE PREPARING TABLE, THE USER JUST DETACHED THE SYRINGE FROM THE CATHETER AND FOUND THE CATHETER SHAFT AND Y-ADAPTER HUB WERE SEPARATED. THE PCI PROCEDURE WENT FINE AND THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON 19JUN2022: THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY OUT OF THE PATIENT'S VESSEL WHEN THE SEPARATION OCCURRED. IT WAS ON THE TABLE THAT THE USER WAS ABOUT TO FILTER THE BLOOD AND THROMBUS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14983309 ↗MalfunctionJun 22, 2022Separation Problem; Separation Problem
AS REPORTED, ABOUT 5-6 INCHES OF IT BROKE OFF WHILE DOING AN INTERVENTION, BUT THANKFULLY WE WERE ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE ENTIRE COMPONENT THAT DETACHED ITSELF. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STATED THAT PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14776231 ↗
Other Catheter, embolectomy devices
- Indigo System CAT6Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY2 deaths408 reports
- Indigo System CATRXKITPenumbra, Inc. · Catheter, Embolectomy1 death339 reports
- Fogarty 120804FPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Catheter, Embolectomy1 recall1 death200 reports
- LeMaitre Embolectomy Catheter 1651-88Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, Embolectomy1 recall161 reports
- FOGARTY 120404FPEdwards Lifesciences LLC · Catheter, Embolectomy1 recall61 reports
- Indigo System CAT6KIT-APenumbra, Inc. · Catheter, Embolectomy109 reports
- LeMaitre Embolectomy Catheter e1651-88Lemaitre Vascular, Inc. · Catheter, Embolectomy2 recalls4 reports
- Indigo System CAT8XTORQ115Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY2 deaths98 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page