Skip to content

VSI IPN916039Recalls & reported problems

Teleflex Incorporated · 7267V · Class 2

All models of VSI (31)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10841156107079), received between Jan 13, 2022 and Apr 10, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Material Separation2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 10, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT: "MICRO INTRODUCER BROKE IN HALF AND THE DISTAL PORTION WAS STUCK INSIDE THE PATIENT'S VEIN. A SNARE WAS USED TO REMOVE IT." ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: "IT WAS SUBCLAVIAN VENOUS ACCESS FOR PPM LEAD PLACEMENT. THERE WAS NO CALCIFICATION."

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21812217 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT "DR. WAS USING A MICRO PUNCTURE IN FEMORAL ACCESS CASE AND THE WIRE SNAPPED WHEN IN USE ON PATIENT". HE WAS PERFORMING A FISTULAGRAM. THE WIRE SEPARATED FROM THE FLOPPY END TO THE MANDREL. THEY WERE HAVING A HARD TIME ACCESSING INTO THE FISTULA, THEY THEN TRIED TO ACCESS FROM OPPOSITE END WITH WIRE-THEY BELIEVE THE WIRE GOT CAUGHT IN STENT STRUTS AND THEY SEPARATED. THEY TRIED SNARING THE FLOPPY END OF WIRE THAT WAS LEFT INSIDE PATIENT BUT WERE UNABLE TO RETRIEVE IT. THEY THEN USED A BIOPSY ACCESS KIT TO GET THE WIRE OUT. THEY WERE ABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO ISSUES, PATIENT WAS IN GOOD CONDITION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM AND THEY WERE REPORTED AS FINE."

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21409325 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2023Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    DURING VENOUS ACCESS PORTION OF THE PROCEDURE, WIRE WAS DIFFICULT TO THREAD THROUGH NEEDLE AND UPON REMOVAL OF NEEDLE AND WIRE, ACCESS WIRE BECAME STUCK AND TIP OF WIRE BROKE OFF.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16120918 ↗
  • InjuryMay 20, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED VIA VOLUNTARY MEDWATCH 5108981. DURING USE ON A PATIENT: TELEFLEX STIFFEN MICRO-INTRODUCER WIRE BEING USED DURING A CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION BECAME LODGED IN THE DISTAL ABDOMINAL AORTA. DURING REMOVAL OF THE LODGED WIRE, A 12-15CM PIECE OF THE WIRE BROKE OFF THE INTRODUCER AND WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2022: TELEFLEX STIFFEN MICRO-INTRODUCER WIRE BEING USED DURING A CARDIAC CATHERIZATION BECAME LOGGED IN THE DISTAL ABDOMINAL AORTA. DURING REMOVAL OF THE LOGGED WIRE A 12-15CM PIECE OF THE WIRE BROKE OFF OF THE INTRODUCER AND WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 14459389 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2022Break; Break

    AS REPORTED: WIRE EMBEDDED IN TISSUE OR PLAQUE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM MEDWATCH (MW5106388) WAS RECEIVED ON 01FEB2022 - TIP OF INTRODUCER BROKE OFF DURING INSERTION AND BECAME EMBEDDED IN WALL OF LEFT FEMORAL ARTERY. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (B)(4).

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 13604342 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 13, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED: DISTAL TIP OF WIRE BECAME ENTRAPPED IN THE LEFT COMMON FEMORAL VEIN. REACHED OUT TO THE CUSTOMER WITH NO FURTHER RESPONSE BACK.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13251462 ↗

Other INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices

All INTRODUCER, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page