MST/Packard A1 .7mm 12° Bent Phaco Tip, 30° PT-32230-RRecalls & reported problems
Microsurgical Technology, Inc. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10844685004314), received between Sep 7, 2017 and Sep 7, 2017 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 7, 2017Fracture; Fracture
THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTICED IMPROPER ULTRASOUND WHEN USING A PHACO TIP. WHEN THE TIP WAS REMOVED TO TROUBLESHOOT THE USER NOTICED THAT THE TIP WAS CRACKED. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR REPORTED SIMILAR MALFUNCTIONS ON TWO OTHER PROCEDURES THAT DID NOT RESULT IN HARM TO THE PATIENTS. THIS IS THE SECOND OF THREE REPORTS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6849556 ↗MalfunctionSep 7, 2017Fracture; Fracture
THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTICED IMPROPER ULTRASOUND WHEN USING A PHACO TIP. WHEN THE TIP WAS REMOVED TO TROUBLESHOOT THE USER NOTICED THAT THE TIP WAS CRACKED. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR REPORTED SIMILAR MALFUNCTIONS ON TWO OTHER PROCEDURES THAT DID NOT RESULT IN HARM TO THE PATIENTS. THIS IS THE THIRD OF THREE REPORTS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6849553 ↗MalfunctionSep 7, 2017Fracture; Fracture
THE FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON NOTICED IMPROPER ULTRASOUND WHEN USING A PHACO TIP. WHEN THE TIP WAS REMOVED TO TROUBLESHOOT THE NOTICED THAT THE TIP WAS CRACKED. THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. THE DOCTOR REPORTED SIMILAR MALFUNCTIONS ON TWO OTHER PROCEDURES THAT DID NOT RESULT IN HARM TO THE PATIENTS. THIS IS THE FIRST OF THREE REPORTS.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6849541 ↗
Other Unit, Phacofragmentation devices
- Centurion 8065751763Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation728 reports
- Centurion 8065753057Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation639 reports
- CENTURION® 8065752914Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation571 reports
- Constellation, Ultravit, 25+, TotalPlus, EdgePlus 8065751617Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation2 recalls398 reports
- Alcon 8065752201Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation1 recall386 reports
- Alcon 8065752200Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation1 recall366 reports
- Constellation, Ultravit, 25+, TotalPlus, EdgePlus 8065751767Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation2 recalls302 reports
- Constellation, ULTRAVIT, Engauge, 25+ 8065752415Alcon Laboratories, Inc. · Unit, phacofragmentation369 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page