Skip to content

24K 24KTIPSRecalls & reported problems

Conmed Corporation · TUBE SET 24K TRUE INTRA-ARTICULAR PRESSURE SENSING · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10845854041185), received between Apr 26, 2017 and Apr 26, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Excess Flow or Over-Infusion” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Excess Flow or Over-Infusion1
  • Increase in Pressure1
  • Pressure Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 26, 2017Excess Flow or Over-Infusion; Increase in Pressure; Pressure Problem; Pressure Problem

    THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF THE 24KTIPS TRUE INTRA-ARTICULAR PRESSURE SENSING TUBING SET IN A SHOULDER ARTHROSCOPY, THE 24K PUMP DID NOT SEEM TO BE REGULATING PRESSURE PROPERLY. THE REPORT FURTHER STATED THAT THE ISSUE SEEMED TO BE RELATED TO PRESSURE SENSING FROM 24KTIPS AND "IT RESULTED IN A DANGEROUS INFLUX OF FLUID AND PRESSURE INTO THE SHOULDER JOINT SPACE". AFTER SOME TROUBLE SHOOTING, THE SURGICAL STAFF IDENTIFIED THAT THE PROBLEM WAS RELATED TO THE 24KTIPS AND THIS SPECIFIC LOT NUMBER. AS REPORTED, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS PLANNED WITH THE USE OF ANOTHER 24KTIPS WITH A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ABNORMAL SWELLING OR EXTRAVASATION OCCURRED. IN ADDITION, FOLLOW-UP WITH THE USER FACILITY CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL SURGICAL OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS OTHERWISE COMPLETED WITH NO PATIENT INJURY WITH THIS REPORTED ISSUE. THIS REPORT IS FILED ON THE BASIC OF POTENTIAL FOR PATIENT INJURY WITH RECURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6522964 ↗

Other ARTHROSCOPE devices

All ARTHROSCOPE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page