Steel 88862414-89Recalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Monofilament Stainless Steel · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Steel (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 12
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521102620), received between Jun 11, 2020 and Oct 11, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries, 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Break4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
- Dull, Blunt2
Patient problems
- Tissue Breakdown6
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding5
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Insufficient Information1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 11, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CARDIAC SURGERY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE DETACHES FROM THE THREAD WHEN THE SURGEON STRETCHES IT TO PLACE IT, NOT ALLOWING IT TO PASS THROUGH THE THICKNESS OF THE STERNUM. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20428784 ↗MalfunctionOct 10, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING A CARDIAC SURGERY PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE DETACHES FROM THE THREAD WHEN THE SURGEON STRETCHES IT TO PLACE IT. NOT ALLOWING IT TO PASS THROUGH THE THICKNESS OF THE STERNUM. A NEW SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20420974 ↗MalfunctionJun 27, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CARDIAC SURGERY, WHILE SUTURING AFTER THE INCISION, THE STEEL THREAD OF THE NEEDLE BROKE. ANOTHER SUTURE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19626164 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG), BLOOD WAS OOZING OUT FROM SURROUNDING WHEN STITCHING THE CHEST CAVITY FROM ALL 5 SUTURES. THERE WAS BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 500CC DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED WITH A DIFFERENT COMPANY'S SUTURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS AND TISSUE DAMAGE DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED 2 DAYS. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 19147440 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG), BLOOD WAS OOZING OUT FROM SURROUNDING WHEN STITCHING THE CHEST CAVITY FROM ALL 5 SUTURES. THERE WAS BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 500CC DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED WITH A DIFFERENT COMPANY'S SUTURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS AND TISSUE DAMAGE DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED 2 DAYS. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 19147328 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG), BLOOD WAS OOZING OUT FROM SURROUNDING WHEN STITCHING THE CHEST CAVITY FROM ALL 5 SUTURES. THERE WAS BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 500CC DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED WITH A DIFFERENT COMPANY'S SUTURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS AND TISSUE DAMAGE DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED 2 DAYS. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 19147305 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG), BLOOD WAS OOZING OUT FROM SURROUNDING WHEN STITCHING THE CHEST CAVITY FROM ALL 5 SUTURES. THERE WAS BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 500CC DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED WITH A DIFFERENT COMPANY'S SUTURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS AND TISSUE DAMAGE DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED 2 DAYS. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 19147030 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING (CABG), BLOOD WAS OOZING OUT FROM SURROUNDING WHEN STITCHING THE CHEST CAVITY FROM ALL 5 SUTURES. THERE WAS BLOOD LOSS OF MORE THAN 500CC DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HAD TO BE RE-OPERATED WITH A DIFFERENT COMPANY'S SUTURE TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS UNANTICIPATED TISSUE LOSS AND TISSUE DAMAGE DUE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION WAS EXTENDED 2 DAYS. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 19146897 ↗MalfunctionApr 10, 2024Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE REPAIR OF A RUPTURED AORTIC SINUS ANEURYSM AND PATENT FORAMEN OVALE ON THE PATIENT, THE STAINLESS STEEL SUTURE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN WHEN THE CHEST WAS CLOSED ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. A REVIEW OF THE X-RAY ON THE SECOND DAY AFTER THE SURGERY SHOWED THAT THERE WERE MULTIPLE OVERLAPPING INTERNAL FIXATION SHADOW ON THE STERNUM, AND A RING-SHAPED SHADOW WAS NOT CLOSED WHICH SHOWED THAT THE SUTURE BROKE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19080700 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2023Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, MORE THAN A YEAR POST-OPERATIVE A OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF PATELLAR FRACTURE, UPON RE-EXAM INATION FOR THE PLANNED REMOVAL OF SUTURE IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURE WAS BROKEN. THE SURGEON CONSIDERED THAT THE FRACTURE HEALING WAS ACCEPTABLE AND THE DEVICE WAS SURGICALLY REMOVED AND A ROUTINE IMAGING DIAGNOSIS WAS CONFIRMED DURING SURGERY.
Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 18104302 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2021Dull, Blunt; Dull, Blunt
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE WIRE WAS NOT CUTTING WELL THROUGH STERNUM AND WAS BLUNT. IT WAS STATED THAT IT WAS DIFFICULT AND DULL TO DRIVE THROUGH TISSUE. IT WAS REQUIRED TO PUSH THE NEEDLE THROUGH. THE PRODUCT WAS CHANGED. IT WAS STATED THAT SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED TO 30 MINUTES OR MORE DUE TO THE DEVICE'S ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11766664 ↗MalfunctionJun 11, 2020Break; Dull, Blunt; Break; Dull, Blunt
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, WHEN CLOSING THE STERNUM, THE NEEDLE WAS NOT SHARP ENOUGH AND COULD BE EASILY BROKEN. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE THE SURGEON OPENED A NEW PACKAGE OF EQUIPMENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10143539 ↗
Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE devices
- ETHICON M660GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE102 reports
- ETHICON M650GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE68 reports
- ETHIBOND EXCEL X425HEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE1 recall12 reports
- Steel 88862224-49Covidien LP · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE1 recall3 reports
- ETHICON M655GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE46 reports
- ETHIBOND EXCEL MB66GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE42 reports
- Steel 88862424-89Covidien LP · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE39 reports
- ETHICON M649GEthicon, LLC · SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, STEEL, MONOFILAMENT AND MULTIFILAMENT, STERILE36 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page