Skip to content

Lapro-Clip 8886848701Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Reusable Long Clip Applier · Class 2

All models of Lapro-Clip (8)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521201941), received between Jul 1, 2019 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare1
  • Difficult to Open or Close1
  • Failure to Fire1
  • Mechanical Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Information1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2026Mechanical Problem; Failure to Fire

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, ON THE FIRST CLIP, THE INNER AND OUTER PARTS DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY. THEN THE SECOND CLIP DID NOT DETACH FROM THE CARTRIDGE. THE OPERATOR USED NEW CLIPS TO CONTINUE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25405123 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 24, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT POSTOPERATIVELY, THE BOLT ON THE HANDLE OF THE CLIP APPLIER HAD DETACHED DURING CLEANING IN THE STERILE ROOM. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22324623 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 29, 2020Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare; Break; Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING SET UP, THE DEVICE PIECE BROKE. IT CANNOT BE ASSEMBLED. IT WILL NOT HOLD ANY CLIP AND DOES NOT HAVE A HOLDER FOR THE CLIP. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9643586 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 1, 2019Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, CLIPPING WAS PERFORMED, BUT THE TIP DID NOT OPEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8751141 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page