INVOS PMAC71RICRecalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Reusable Infant Sensor Adapter Cable for PM7100 · Class 2
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521806436), received between Nov 18, 2024 and May 21, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Erratic or Intermittent Display” (3 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K182868, K211561); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Jan 9, 2024Open, Classified
manufacturing defects to sensor cable connectors may result in error codes or non-functioning channel
Z-1731-2024 · Root cause: Process design · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Erratic or Intermittent Display3
- High Readings2
- Low Readings2
- Communication or Transmission Problem1
- Device Alarm System1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 21, 2025Communication or Transmission Problem; Communication or Transmission Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THE SENSOR PRODUCED "POOR SIGNAL QUALITY" ERROR. IT WAS DISCOVERED AFTER OTHER RIC CABLE WAS USED AND SENSOR WAS CHECKED SEPARATELY. TROUBLESHOOTING WAS SWAPPED CABLES, SENSORS, PREAMPS AND WAS ISOLATED TO RIC CABLES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22061697 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Erratic or Intermittent Display; Erratic or Intermittent Display
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE, ERRATIC SPO2 AND RSO2 READINGS WERE OBSERVED, FLUCTUATING BETWEEN 15 AND 80. INITIALLY, CEREBRAL READINGS HAD BEEN STABLE FOR THE FIRST HOUR BUT LATER BECAME ERRATIC, WHILE RENAL SENSOR READINGS REMAINED STABLE. THERE HAD BEEN INSTANCES OF BAD OR LOST SIGNALS, ACCOMPANIED BY A YELLOW VISUAL ALARM. NO BASELINE READING HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED BEFORE THE PROCEDURE, AND THE PATIENT'S POSITION CHANGE STATUS WAS UNKNOWN. TWO CHANNELS HAD BEEN IN USE DURING THE EVENT. IMPORTANTLY, NO PATIENT HARM HAD OCCURRED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20852052 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2024Device Alarm System; Erratic or Intermittent Display; High Readings; Low Readings; Device Alarm System; Erratic or Intermittent Display; High Readings; Low Readings
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE UNIT HAD ERRATIC SPO2 READINGS RANGING FROM ZERO TO HIGH VALUES OF 70, 80, AND 90. FURTHERMORE, THE VALUE DISAPPEARED AND THE MONITOR WAS SHOWING AN ALARM OF 'LOW SOUND LEVEL'. THE MONITORS WERE ALSO CONNECTED THROUGH A MODULE TO A MONITOR BY A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER. ONE CHANNEL ON THE MONITOR WAS SHOWING A FIXED VALUE OF 62, WHILE THE VALUE ON THE OTHER MONITOR WAS CHANGING. IN ADDITION STRANGE READINGS DEFINED AS CORRUPTED, CABLES AND PRE-AMPLIFIERS WERE USED ALONG WITH THE MONITOR AND VISUAL ALARM SHOWED IN YELLOW. THERE WAS NO SOUND/NO SIGNAL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20716003 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2024Erratic or Intermittent Display; High Readings; Low Readings; Erratic or Intermittent Display; High Readings; Low Readings
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE UNIT HAD ERRATIC SPO2 READINGS RANGING FROM ZERO TO HIGH VALUES OF 70, 80, AND 90. FURTHERMORE, THE VALUE DISAPPEARED AND THE MONITOR WAS SHOWING AN ALARM OF 'LOW SOUND LEVEL'. THE MONITORS WERE ALSO CONNECTED THROUGH A MODULE TO A MONITOR BY A DIFFERENT MANUFACTURER. ONE CHANNEL ON THE MONITOR WAS SHOWING A FIXED VALUE OF 62, WHILE THE VALUE ON THE OTHER MONITOR WAS CHANGING. IN ADDITION STRANGE READINGS DEFINED AS CORRUPTED, CABLES AND PRE-AMPLIFIERS WERE USED ALONG WITH THE MONITOR AND VISUAL ALARM SHOWED IN YELLOW. THERE WAS NO SOUND/NO SIGNAL. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20715332 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K182868, K211561. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-1732-2024 · Jan 9, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMedtronic Invos, Reusable Sensor Cable for PM7100, REF: PMAC71RSC
Other Oximeter, tissue saturation devices
- INVOS PMAC71RSCCovidien LP · Oximeter, tissue saturation1 recall67 reports
- HEMOSPHERE FORESIGHT MODULE HEMFSM10Edwards Lifesciences LLC · Oximeter, Tissue Saturation1 recall12 reports
- FORE-SIGHT ELITE® 01-06-3000Cas Medical Systems, Inc. · Oximeter, Tissue Saturation1 recall1 death2 reports
- Invos 5100C-EUCovidien LP · Oximeter, tissue saturation22 reports
- INVOS PM7100Covidien LP · Oximeter, tissue saturation21 reports
- INVOS PM7100Covidien LP · Oximeter, tissue saturation18 reports
- INVOS 5100C-PACovidien LP · Oximeter, tissue saturation15 reports
- O3 4384Masimo Corporation · Oximeter, tissue saturation15 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.