Skip to content

McGRATH MAC 350-017-000 (UDI 10884521824331)Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Disposable Laryngoscope Blade 2 · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521824331), received between Oct 8, 2024 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Electrical /Electronic Property Problem” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 4 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Electrical /Electronic Property Problem3
  • Material Opacification1
  • Moisture Damage1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 24, 2025Material Opacification; Material Opacification

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FOG WAS PRESENTED DURING PROCEDURE. THERE WAS CONDENSATION ON THE BLADE. DEVICE REPLACED WITH ANOTHER ONE WITH NO FOGGING ISSUES WITH THIS OTHER DEVICE. DELAY IN MANAGEMENT WAS REPORTED BUT NO CLINICAL CONSEQUENCE IN THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23640121 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE PICTURE QUALITY LOOKED NORMAL PRIOR TO INTUBATION. DURING INTUBATION THE PICTURE QUALITY BECAME CLOUDED/FOGGED. ONCE THE BLADE WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT'S AIRWAY THE VISUAL QUALITY BECAME POOR. TRIED ALTERNATE SIZE BLADE FROM A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER AND DID NOT EXPERIENCED THE SAME ISSUE. TRIED SEVERAL SIZE 2 BLADES FROM THE SAME LOT NUMBER AND EXPERIENCE THE SAME ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20398111 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE "FOG" ON THE BLADE PREVENTED THE CHILD FROM BEING INTUBATED. ANOTHER BLADE WAS USED TO INTUBATE THE PATIENT AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20397862 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE PICTURE QUALITY LOOKED NORMAL PRIOR TO INTUBATION. DURING INTUBATION THE PICTURE QUALITY BECAME "CLOUDED/FOGGED." ONCE THE BLADE WAS INSERTED INTO THE PATIENT'S AIRWAY THE VISUAL QUALITY BECAME POOR. AN ALTERNATE SIZE BLADE FROM A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER WAS USED AND DID NOT EXPERIENCE THE SAME ISSUE. SEVERAL SIZE 2 BLADES FROM THE SAME LOT NUMBER WERE TRIED AND EXPERIENCED THE SAME ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20397784 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Moisture Damage; Moisture Damage

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THERE WAS FOG SEEN ON THE SIZE 2 BLADE OF THE DEVICE. IT WAS THEN USED WITH DIFFICULTY ON A 3 YEAR OLD CHILD, WHICH ON EXPOSURE, THE APPEARANCE OF THE MIST MADE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO VISUALIZE THE GLOTTIS AND DID BLIND INTUBATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT OUTCOME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20397617 ↗

Other LARYNGOSCOPE, RIGID devices

All LARYNGOSCOPE, RIGID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page