Skip to content

Endo Mini-Shears 174309Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Shears with Roticulator Technology · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
16
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884523000689), received between Jan 15, 2018 and Feb 7, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 15 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (14 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 2 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break14
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Melted1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient7
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
  • No Patient Involvement2
  • Burn(s)1
  • Unspecified Tissue Injury1

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC MASTECTOMY, THE SILICONE PAD ON THE FIRST DEVICE BURNED DURING THE PEELING CAUTERY. A NEW DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE WAS USED. HOWEVER, SIMILAR SILICONE PAD DAMAGE OCCURRED DURING THE FINAL STAGES OF PEELING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18664478 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC MASTECTOMY, THE SILICONE PAD ON THE FIRST DEVICE BURNED DURING THE PEELING CAUTERY. A NEW DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE WAS USED. HOWEVER, SIMILAR SILICONE PAD DAMAGE OCCURRED DURING THE FINAL STAGES OF PEELING. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18664464 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2022Melted; Melted

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING SEPARATION OPERATION OF THE AREA AROUND THE LIVER IN A LAPAROSCOPIC HEPATECTOMY, WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS USED IN THE ROTICULATE STATE, IT ACTIVATED FROM THE INNER SIDE OF THE ARTICULATION PART. THE LIVER WAS BURNED AS A RESULT, HOWEVER, THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NORMAL HEMOSTASIS OPERATION. AFTERWARDS, WHEN THE PRODUCT WAS CHECKED OUTSIDE THE BODY, THE INNER SIDE OF THE ARTICULATION PART WAS FOUND TO BE IN THE STATE THAT SEEMED HAD MELTED, SO THEY STOPPED USING THE PRODUCT. THE PRODUCT WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE.

    Patient problems: Burn(s); Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 14889693 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 19, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BAND REMOVAL, THE TRANSPARENT PLASTIC MEMBRANE THAT COMES OUT OF THE SHAFT WHEN THE ROTICULATOR JAW IS ACTIVATED, TORN UNEXPECTEDLY. THE SURGEON USED THE SAME DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11347676 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 13, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION PROCEDURE, THE SHEATH OF THE SHAFT CAME OFF. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9953507 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9769316 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9769302 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY, THE DEVICE¿S WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9765311 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE WHITE PLASTIC COVER OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 9763219 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN ON THE TWO DEVICES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9763207 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 27, 2020Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRAOPERATIVELY, WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN ON THE TWO DEVICES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9763203 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVELY, THE STAPLER DID NOT FIRE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE SURGICAL SHEARS HAD NO BITE DUE TO SPLIT JOINT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8974877 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 17, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING TRANS-ABDOMINAL PRE-PERITONEAL REPAIR (TAPP), THE ARTICULATION PART (TRANSPARENT PART) BROKE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8522965 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2018Break; Mechanical Problem; Break; Mechanical Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, WHITE PLASTIC COVER WAS BROKEN. ALSO THE DEVICE DID NOT GRASP PROPERLY AND THE HANDLES DID NOT BIND.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7910103 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 7, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE ISSUE OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE - TAP (TRANSABDOMINAL PREPERITONEAL REPAIR). THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FORM THE PACKAGING AND WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE SHEATH WAS FRAYED AND NOT IN THE STRAIGHT POSITION. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7250313 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 15, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: OCCURRED DURING A THORACOSCOPIC LOBECTOMY PROCEDURE. AFTER REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE PACKAGING, TRIED TO RETRACT THE ARTICULATED TIP BY ROTATING THE CENTER ROD DIAL. BUT THE PLASTIC PART AT THE TIP OF THE DEVICE BROKE AND WAS CAUGHT BY THE DEVICE. IT COULD NOT BE RETRACTED. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED ON THE PATIENT. A NEW DEVICE WAS OPENED AND THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER PROBLEMS. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. THE STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS REPORTED AS NO PROBLEM.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7191936 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page