Skip to content

MITEK CRUCIATE+ 219018Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · MITEK CRUCIATE+ Outside-In Suture Passer · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886705025664), received between Sep 26, 2019 and Jun 14, 2023 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Deformation1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 14, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY SALES REP THAT DURING AN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6)2023, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CRUCIATE SUTURE PASSING PIN WAS BENT; AND THAT THEY WERE UNABLE TO PASS THE SUTURE. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17126267 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 26, 2019Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP VIA PHONE THAT DURING AN ACL RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE THE CUSTOMER'S CRUCIATE+ SUTURE PASSING PIN TIP WAS BENT. THE SALES REP STATED THAT THE BEND IN THE DEVICE WAS NOTICED DURING THE CASE, AND IT WAS CHALLENGING TO PUSH THE PIN THROUGH THE SHAFT OF THE GUIDE. THE SALES REP COULD NOT CONFIRM WHEN OR HOW THE DEVICE BECAME BENT AND STATED THAT THERE WERE NO PROCEDURAL OR ANATOMY FACTORS. THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE WITH NO PATIENT HARM OR DELAY. THE SALES REP COULD NOT PROVIDE A LOT NUMBER. THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED BY THE CUSTOMER. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THERE WAS A SPARE DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9122598 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page