Skip to content

MITEK CRUCIATE+ 219003Recalls & reported problems

Medos International Sàrl · MITEK CRUCIATE+ Beath Pin Bullet 2.4mm 15-85mm Plus or Minus 8 Percent · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886705025855), received between Jan 30, 2019 and Feb 5, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Deformation1
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 5, 2024Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation; Difficult to Advance; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORTED BY SALES REP THAT DURING SOFT TISSUE ACL RECONSTRUCTION PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT WHILE TRYING TO DRILL TIBIAL TUNNEL, THE CRUCIATE+ BEATH PIN BULLET DEVICE WOULD NOT ENGAGE THE CRUCIATE GUIDE CARRIAGE PROPERLY. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE MIGHT HAVE BEEN BENT. ANOTHER LIKE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES NOR SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18639669 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2019Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE VIA EMAIL THAT THE FAILURE OF THE CRUCIATE+ BEATH PIN BULLET WAS IDENTIFIED DURING ITS CORRECT USE IN A CADAVEROUS COURSE, THE BEATH PIN 14'', WHICH WAS A PART OF THE DISPOSABLE KIT GOT TRAPPED AND LOCKED INSIDE THE BULLET. WHEN TRYING TO RELEASE IT, THE BULLET WAS BROKEN AND WAS REMAINING IN 2 PARTS IMAGES ATTACHED. BUT STILL THE DRILL DID NOT COME OUT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8756231 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 30, 2019Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE THE ACR DRILLPN W/EYE AND THE CRUCIATE + BEATH PIN BULLET BECAME STUCK TOGETHER. THE DEVICES BECAME STUCK WHILE DRILLING THE TIBIAL TUNNEL. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A BACK-UP TRAY. THERE WAS 39-SECOND DELAY IN SURGERY AND NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THIS REPORT IS 2 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8290072 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page