LCP 02.114.014Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 1.5MM LCP CONDYLAR PLATE 6 HOLE SHAFT · Class 2 · Implant
All models of LCP (367)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982034922), received between Aug 13, 2018 and Aug 13, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility3
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 13, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
THIS REPORT IS FOR A VETERINARY CASE. THERE WAS NO HUMAN PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES EUROPE REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OSTEOSYNTHESIS FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES ON (B)(6) 2018. DURING THE PROCEDURE, SURGEON ATTACHED TWO (2) BENDING PINS TO A PLATE, THEN TRIED TO CONTOUR THE PLATE USING THE BENDING PINS. HOWEVER, THE BENDING PINS CAME OFF THE PLATE WHILE BENDING. SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO USE TWO (2) OTHER PLATES BUT OBTAINED THE SAME RESULTS. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE, A LOCKING SCREW WOULD NOT LOCK TO THE PLATES. SURGEON WAS NOT SURE IF THE ISSUE WAS DUE TO THE BENDING PINS OR THE SCREW HOLE ON THE PLATES. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES AND NO REPORTED CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 1.5MM LCP CONDYLAR PLATE. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 5 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7779225 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
THIS REPORT IS FOR A VETERINARY CASE. THERE WAS NO HUMAN PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES EUROPE REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OSTEOSYNTHESIS FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES ON (B)(6) 2018. DURING THE PROCEDURE, SURGEON ATTACHED TWO (2) BENDING PINS TO A PLATE, THEN TRIED TO CONTOUR THE PLATE USING THE BENDING PINS. HOWEVER, THE BENDING PINS CAME OFF THE PLATE WHILE BENDING. SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO USE TWO (2) OTHER PLATES BUT OBTAINED THE SAME RESULTS. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE, A LOCKING SCREW WOULD NOT LOCK TO THE PLATES. SURGEON WAS NOT SURE IF THE ISSUE WAS DUE TO THE BENDING PINS OR THE SCREW HOLE ON THE PLATES. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES AND NO REPORTED CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) 1.5MM LCP CONDYLAR PLATE. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 5 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7779222 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2018Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
THIS REPORT IS FOR A VETERINARY CASE. THERE WAS NO HUMAN PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES EUROPE REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT AN OSTEOSYTHESIS FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES ON (B)(6) 2018. DURING THE PROCEDURE, SURGEON ATTACHED TWO (2) BENDING PINS TO A PLATE, THEN TRIED TO CONTOUR THE PLATE USING THE BENDING PINS. HOWEVER, THE BENDING PINS CAME OFF THE PLATE WHILE BENDING. SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO USE TWO (2) OTHER PLATES BUT OBTAINED THE SAME RESULTS. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE, A LOCKING SCREW WOULD NOT LOCK TO THE PLATES. SURGEON WAS NOT SURE IF THE ISSUE WAS DUE TO THE BENDING PINS OR THE SCREW HOLE ON THE PLATES. SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A DELAY OF APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES AND NO REPORTED CONSEQUENCE TO THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1). THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 5 FOR (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7779194 ↗
Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices
- Lapiplasty System 2 SK14Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone260 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls6 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MLT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls5 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MRT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-DRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF40Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRT42Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page