Skip to content

NA 04.211.040Recalls & reported problems

Synthes GmbH · 2.7MM TI VA LCKNG SCR SLF-TPNG WITH T8 STARDRIVE RECESS 40MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982119124), received between Jan 9, 2024 and May 8, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Entrapment of Device1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 8, 2026Break; Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2026, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ORIF SURGERY FOR DISTAL HUMERUS FRACTURE WITH PLATES AND SCREWS. DURING SURGERY, AFTER USING TWO PLATES TO FIX THE FRACTURE, THE IMAGE SHOWED THAT THE INNER PLATE WAS MISALIGNED. AFTER REMOVING THE PROXIMAL SCREWS, THE PLATE POSITION WAS FINELY ADJUSTED AND THEN REINSTALLED WITH CORTEX SCREWS. DURING THAT PROCESS, THE TWO DISTAL SCREWS IN QUESTION THAT HAD NOT BEEN REMOVED BROKE OFF BELOW THE SCREW HEADS. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE PLATE, PULLED OUT THOSE TWO SCREWS WITH HERCULES PLIERS, AND THEN REINSTALLED THE PLATE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHIN 30MINUTES SURGICAL DELAY. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT THIS EVENT WAS CAUSED BY EXCESSIVE STRESS TO THE SCREWS BY FORCING THE PLATE INTO PLACE DURING REINSTALLATION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 25123559 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 9, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent; Device-Device Incompatibility; Material Twisted/Bent

    DEVICE REPORT FROM JAPAN REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON DECEMBER 14, 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION (ORIF) WITH PLATE AND LOCKING SCREWS FOR A RIGHT OLECRANON FRACTURE. FINAL LOCKING OF THE LOCKING SCREWS WAS PERFORMED AFTER ALL THE SCREWS WERE INSERTED. THE LOCKING SCREW HEAD WAS SPINNING IDLE IN THE HOLE AND COULD NOT BE TIGHTENED. THE LOCKING SCREW IN QUESTION WAS INSERTED IN VARIABLE ANGLE (VA) MODE. IMAGING SHOWED THAT THE LOCKING SCREW SLIGHTLY INTERFERED WITH ANOTHER LOCKING SCREW WHICH WAS INSERTED INTO THE DIAPHYSIS. THIS OTHER LOCKING SCREW WAS FULLY TIGHTENED. ALTHOUGH THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE LOCKING SCREW IN QUESTION TO REPLACE WITH A SHORTER LOCKING SCREW, IT KEPT SPINNING AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THEREFORE, THE LOCKING SCREW REMAINED IN THE BODY. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE OVERALL FIXATION AND ADDITIONAL SCREWS WERE NOT INSERTED. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH NO DELAY. PATIENT WAS STABLE. THERE IS NO PLAN AT THIS TIME FOR IMPLANT REMOVAL AFTER BONE UNION. THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE INFORMED THE SURGEON THAT THE SCREW HEAD HAS STRIPPED AND MIGHT BE DIFFICULT TO R

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18476397 ↗

Other Screw, fixation, bone devices

All Screw, fixation, bone devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page