LCP 222.229Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · LCP PROXIMAL LATERAL TIBIA PLATE 13 HOLES/300MM-LEFT · Class 2 · Implant
All models of LCP (367)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982156693), received between Mar 15, 2018 and Sep 18, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 18, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE ROTATOR CUFF NEOPLASTY THE IMPLANT BROKE. THE BROKEN PIECE DIDN'T FALL INTO PATIENT. THEY CHANGED TO A NEW ONE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO DELAY DURING PROCEDURE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL FROM THE AFFILIATE ON DECEMBER 30, 2015: IT WAS NOTED THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY EITHER USING THE SAME BONE HOLE OR CREATING AN ADDITIONAL ONE. THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT EXTENDED FOR MORE THAN THIRTY (30) MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7885257 ↗MalfunctionAug 31, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE CUSTOMER'S HEALIX BR 4.5MM ANCHOR WITH ORTHOCORD BROKE UPON INSERTION. THE SURGEON FULLY REMOVED THE BROKEN PIECE AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH ANOTHER SAME TYPE, SAME SIZE ANCHOR IN THE SAME BONE HOLE. THE SALES REP REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS NOT OFF-AXIS AND THAT THE BONE QUALITY WAS GOOD. THE CUSTOMER ALREADY DISCARDED THE COMPLAINT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7838835 ↗MalfunctionAug 1, 2018Break; Break
SCREW BREAKAGE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW BROKE IN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM PATIENT. CHANGED NEW ONE TO COMPLETE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT ON PATIENT REPORT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7739832 ↗MalfunctionJul 19, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE SALES REP THAT THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE CUSTOMER'S 4.5MM HEALIX BR ANCHOR BROKE UPON INSERTION INTO THE BONE HOLE DURING A SHOULDER SURGICAL PROCEDURE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE ANCHOR AND ALL BROKEN PIECES AND DISCARDED THEM. HE THEN CREATED A NEW BONE HOLE AND INSERTED ANOTHER ANCHOR TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES OR DELAYS. THE BONE QUALITY WAS AVERAGE. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7704197 ↗MalfunctionJul 9, 2018Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED FROM (B)(6) THAT DURING AN UNSPECIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE ANCHOR DEVICE BROKE. IT WAS NOT REPORTED IF THERE WAS A DELAY IN THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE; HOWEVER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SPARE DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE IN THE SAME BONE HOLE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETRIEVED FROM PATIENT. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WERE NO INJURIES, MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7669714 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2018Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 10/26/2018 STATED THAT THE PATIENT HAS GOOD BONE QUALITY. THE PLACEMENT WAS DONE ACCORDING TO TECHNIQUE AND WASN'T OFF AXIS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A FRAGMENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND AN ADDITIONAL BONE HOLE WAS MADE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE USING ANCHORS FROM ANOTHER COMPANY. THERE WAS A DELAY ABOUT 10 MINUTES. THERE WAS NO CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT. THE ITEM WAS RETURNED ON FEBRUARY 28TH.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7341741 ↗
Other PLATE, FIXATION, BONE devices
- Lapiplasty System 2 SK14Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone260 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls6 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MLT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls5 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MRT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-DRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF40Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRT42Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page