Skip to content

MAXFRAME 03.312.001Recalls & reported problems

Synthes GmbH · WIRE TENSIONER · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982261106), received between May 15, 2020 and Jan 3, 2024 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Slipped” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Slipped4
  • Mechanical Jam3
  • Mechanical Problem2
  • Crack1
  • Scratched Material1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2024Device Slipped; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN (B)(6) 2023 THE MAXFRAME TENSIONER SLIPPED DURING TENSIONING. THE TENSIONER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PROCEDURE AND SET ASIDE FOR REVIEW. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE. THERE WAS NO GENERATION OF FRAGMENTS. THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE (1) WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18433995 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 2, 2022Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam; Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022 THEY WERE DOING A MAXFRAME WITH SURGEON. DURING THE CASE HAVING ISSUES WITH THE TENSIONERS IN THE SET. THEY KEPT PISTONING ON THE WIRE AND LOSING THEIR TENSION. THEY REACHED OUT AND THE ENGINEERS FOR MAXFRAME CALLED IN DURING THE CASE TO DISCUSS THE ISSUES. SURGEON HAD BEEN DOING FRAMES FOR YEARS. THEY WERE ABLE TO FINISH THE CASE AND GET OUT OF THE OR. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH SURGICAL DELAY. THIS REPORT IS FOR A WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 3 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15716967 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 2, 2022Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam; Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6)2022 THEY WERE DOING A MAXFRAME WITH SURGEON. DURING THE CASE HAVING ISSUES WITH THE TENSIONERS IN THE SET. THEY KEPT PISTONING ON THE WIRE AND LOSING THEIR TENSION. THEY REACHED OUT AND THE ENGINEERS FOR MAXFRAME CALLED IN DURING THE CASE TO DISCUSS THE ISSUES. SURGEON HAD BEEN DOING FRAMES FOR YEARS. THEY WERE ABLE TO FINISH THE CASE AND GET OUT OF THE OR. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH SURGICAL DELAY. THIS REPORT IS FOR A WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 3 FOR PC-(B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15716954 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 2, 2022Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam; Device Slipped; Mechanical Jam

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6)2022 THEY WERE DOING A MAXFRAME WITH SURGEON. DURING THE CASE HAVING ISSUES WITH THE TENSIONERS IN THE SET. THEY KEPT PISTONING ON THE WIRE AND LOSING THEIR TENSION. THEY REACHED OUT AND THE ENGINEERS FOR MAXFRAME CALLED IN DURING THE CASE TO DISCUSS THE ISSUES. SURGEON HAD BEEN DOING FRAMES FOR YEARS. THEY WERE ABLE TO FINISH THE CASE AND GET OUT OF THE OR. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH SURGICAL DELAY. THIS REPORT IS FOR A WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 3 FOR PC-(B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15716950 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 28, 2022Crack; Scratched Material; Crack; Scratched Material

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN THE USA AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE THAT THE WIRE TENSIONER WAS UNABLE TO STERILIZE/ASSEMBLE. CHIPPING AND CRACKING. UNABLE TO USE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY. PROCEDURE AND PATIENT OUTCOME WERE UNKNOWN. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES ONE (1) DEVICE WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14845167 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2020Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, 2 WIRE TENSIONERS WERE NOT TENSIONING, THEY WERE NOT GRIPPING THE WIRE. THE FRAME CONSTRUCT HAD 8 WIRES TOTAL, AND 6 OF THEM WERE SUCCESSFULLY TENSIONED BUT THE REMAINING TWO WERE NOT. THE DOCTOR HAD GOTTEN THE WIRE TENSIONERS TO WORK AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY. THE PATIENT'S STATUS IS UNKNOWN. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN WIRES (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY# 2). THIS REPORT IS FOR 1 WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10063589 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2020Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, 2 WIRE TENSIONERS WERE NOT TENSIONING, THEY WERE NOT GRIPPING THE WIRE. THE FRAME CONSTRUCT HAD 8 WIRES TOTAL, AND 6 OF THEM WERE SUCCESSFULLY TENSIONED BUT THE REMAINING TWO WERE NOT. THE DOCTOR HAD GOTTEN THE WIRE TENSIONERS TO WORK AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY. THE PATIENT'S STATUS IS UNKNOWN. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN WIRE (PART# UNKNOWN, LOT# UNKNOWN, QUANTITY# 2). THIS REPORT IS FOR 1 WIRE TENSIONER. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10063578 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page