MatrixRIB 04.501.211.01Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · 2.7MM MATRIXRIB TI LCKNG SCREW SELF-DRILLING/11MM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of MatrixRIB (31)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10887587074344), received between May 20, 2022 and May 20, 2022 — classified as 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (10 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility10
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 10 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14453850 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 9 OF 10 FOR (B)(5). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14453381 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 8 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14453365 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 7 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14453175 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 6 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14453066 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 5 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14452874 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN). THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14452807 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2022 UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 4 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14452700 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 2 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14452352 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2022Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6), 2022 DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, SCRUB TECH TRIED TO RETAIN SCREWS ON DRIVER BLADE, HANDED THIS LOADED DRIVER TO THE SURGEON. WHILE THE SURGEON WAS POSITIONING THE SCREW OVER THE PATIENT, THE SCREW FELL OFF INTO THE PATIENT'S CHEST CAVITY. UPON INSPECTION. SEVERAL 11MM SCREWS DID NOT RETAIN ON THE DRIVER BLADE. MULTIPLE DRIVER BLADES WERE USED TO TEST THE NON-RETAINING SCREWS, SO THE ORIGINAL DRIVER BLADE WAS NOT THE ISSUE. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A SURGICAL DELAY OF 30 MINUTES. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: UNKNOWN SCREW/ROD CONSTRUCT ACCESSORIES (PART# UNKNOWN; LOT# UNKNOWN; QUANTITY: UNKNOWN) THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 10 FOR (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS FOR A MATRIXRIB SCREW.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14452081 ↗
Other Plate, fixation, bone devices
- Lapiplasty System 2 SK14Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone260 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls6 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MLT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls5 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MRT4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-PLF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls3 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-DRF4BNuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls1 report
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MLT42Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
- PRECICE® Plating System LP4.5-MRT42Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. · Plate, Fixation, Bone3 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page