YUKON OCT Spinal System 7601-03514Recalls & reported problems
VB Spine LLC · Polyaxial Screw Ø3.5x14 mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of YUKON OCT Spinal System (54)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10888857349315), received between Aug 2, 2019 and Jan 2, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Migration2
- Physical Resistance/Sticking2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Fracture1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Neuropathy1
- No Information1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 2, 2024Insufficient Device Problem Information; Migration; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Migration
A PATIENT EXPERIENCED MIGRATION OF A C7 YUKON SET SCREW APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. REVISION SURGERY IS NOT CURRENTLY PLANNED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18428103 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2021Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVED THEIR INITIAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020 WHERE THEY RECEIVED A POSTERIOR CERVICAL FIXATION / FUSION. THE PATIENT THEN PRESENTED WITH CONSISTENT MYELOPATHY AMONG OTHER PAIN COMPLAINTS IN THEIR CERVICAL AREA. AN EXTENSION OF THE POSTERIOR CERVICAL LATERAL MASS FUSION AS WELL LAMINECTOMY WAS THEN PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2021. DURING THE PLANNED REVISION SURGERY, THE YUKON SCREW AT C5 WHICH WAS ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED IN (B)(6) 2020 WAS NOTICED TO BE FRACTURED DURING REMOVAL. HALF OF THE SHAFT ATTACHED TO THE SCREW HEAD WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED WHILE THE OTHER HALF REMAINS IN THE PATIENT. WELL ESTABLISHED BONE FUSION WAS NOTED ON THE REMAINING IMPLANTED SCREWS.
Patient problems: Neuropathy; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; Pain
MAUDE report 13047668 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A YUKON SCREW INSERTER "STUCK" TO THE SCREW WHILE INSERTING AT THE RIGHT C3, CAUSING THE SURGEON TO APPLY ADDITIONAL FORCE. THIS FORCE BROKE THROUGH THE LATERAL MASS WHICH MADE IT ESSENTIAL TO EXTEND THE CONSTRUCT UP TO THE RIGHT C2 RESULTING IN A 10 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY. THIS RECORD CAPTURES THE POLYAXIAL SCREW . IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE YUKON OCT POLYAXIAL SCREW HAD NO CAUSE TO THE ADVERSE EVENT AND THAT THE DEVICE DID NOT MALFUNCTION. THEREFORE, THIS DEVICE IS A CONCOMITANT PRODUCT.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9169098 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT THE SCREW SITE PREPARATION, THE YUKON POLYAXIAL SCREW Ø3.5X14 MM WAS "DIFFICULT TO LOAD SECURELY THE INSERT DRIVER" THE EVENT WAS NOTED DURING A CASE PREPARATION; THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THE CASE WAS SUCCESSFULLY EXECUTED USING ALTERNATIVE SCREWS THAT WERE READILY AVAILABLE TO THE PHYSICIAN. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT AS THE EVENT WAS IDENTIFIED PREOPERATIVELY.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 8950626 ↗InjuryAug 2, 2019Migration; Migration; Physical Resistance/Sticking
A PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT A YUKON POLYAXIAL SCREW BECAME ¿STUCK¿ AT THE HEAD POSTOPERATIVELY. FOLLOWING IMPLANT SURGERY, THE PATIENT DID NOT WEAR THEIR CERVICAL COLLAR AS DIRECTED BY THE PHYSICIAN AND, ¿WENT BACK TO REGULAR ACTIVITIES BEFORE THEY WERE ADVISED TO.¿ THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND LAMINA SCREWS C3 THROUGH C6 WERE REPLACED. PATIENT WAS REVISED AND ALL LAMINA SCREWS C3-C6 WERE REPLACED.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8857535 ↗
Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL devices
- EXPEDIUM 179702000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL439 reports
- EXPEDIUM VERSE 199721001Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL227 reports
- XIA 3 48230000Stryker Corporation · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL193 reports
- VIPER 186715000Medos International Sàrl · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL1 death167 reports
- NA 04.614.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL80 reports
- NA 04.615.014Synthes GmbH · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- EXPEDIUM VIPER 196789480Depuy Spine, LLC · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL72 reports
- Arsenal Deformity Spinal Fixation System 47127Alphatec Spine, Inc. · APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERLAMINAL66 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page