Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-8941KTRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · THRDED G-WIRE,W/TRCR TIP,.062" · Class 1

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10888867051840), received between Jan 10, 2018 and Mar 7, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Component Missing1
  • Detachment Of Device Component1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient3
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Break; Break

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 3/24/2025: THERE WAS NO DELAYED IN THE CASE, AND ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA WAS NOT NEEDED. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO NEGATIVE EFFECTS ON OR AFTER THE SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 21548837 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2019Break; Difficult to Remove; Component Missing

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING A LISFRANC PROCEDURE, THE AR-8941KT THREADED GUIDEWIRE WITH TROCAR TIP WAS USED AS PROVISIONAL POINT OF FIXATION. AS THE SURGEON REMOVED THE GUIDEWIRE, IT CAME OUT MISSING THE THREADED TIP. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO LEAVE THE TIP IN THE BONE, AS IT WAS MID-SHAFT AND NOT CAPABLE OF MIGRATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 05/15/2019: THE AGENCY CONFIRMED THE LOT NUMBER OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE IS UNKNOWN. THE REP STATED THE SURGEON USED MULTIPLE INSTRUMENTS IN ATTEMPT TO EXTRACT THE BROKEN FRAGMENT, BUT THE FRAGMENT WAS BURIED IN THE BONE MIDSHAFT AND COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED. THE SURGEON CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO CHANCE OF MIGRATION, AND THAT RETRIEVING THE PIECE WOULD CAUSE MORE HARM TO THE PATIENT THEN LEAVING IT IMPLANTED. THE REMAINING SHAFT OF THE GUIDEWIRE WAS DISCARDED BY THE FACILITY AND WILL NOT BE RETURNING FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 8611789 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2018Break; Detachment Of Device Component; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHILST IMPLANTING A CANNULATED SCREW, THE TIP OF APPROXIMATELY 5 MM FROM A 1.6 MM K WIRE BROKE-OFF IN THE PATIENT'S BONE. THE SURGEON ASSESSED THE SITUATION AND DECIDED THAT IT WOULD BE IN THE PATIENT'S BEST INTEREST TO LEAVE THE TIP IN THE BONE AS IT WOULD CAUSE MORE DAMAGE TO REMOVE THE FRAGMENT. PERFORMED SURGERY WAS A TRIPLE ANKLE FUSION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH THE SAME DEVICE ANYWAY.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 7439309 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2018Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MPFL/ TIBIAL TUBERCLE OSTEOTOMY PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE THREADED GUIDE PIN BROKE-OFF INTO THE TIBIA WHILE THE SURGEON WAS PLACING IT ACROSS THE OSTEOTOMY FOR 4.5 MM LPS FIXATION. THE SURGEON MADE NO ATTEMPT TO RETRIEVE THE TIP OF THE PIN AND THE TIP WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. PATIENT IS A FEMALE, (B)(6). FOLLOW-UP INVESTIGATION: X-RAYS WERE TAKEN TO CONFIRM DEVICE LOCATION. DEVICE TIP IS EMBEDDED IN THE TIBIAL TUBERCLE. NO PICTURES WERE AVAILABLE. THE REMAINING PORTION OF THE GUIDE PIN WAS DISCARDED AND IS NOT BEING RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 7178414 ↗

Other Orthopedic manual surgical instrument devices

All Orthopedic manual surgical instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page