Skip to content

Shoreline ACS 85-2006Recalls & reported problems

Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · 6-7mm, No Profile Locking Cover · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Shoreline ACS (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10889981125042), received between Jun 9, 2025 and Mar 2, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1
  • Premature Separation1
  • Separation Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 2, 2026Separation Problem

    ORTHOFIX WAS MADE AWARE ON 03 FEB 2026 THAT A WAVEFORM C NO-PROFILE INTERBODY DEVICE LOCKING COVER WAS OBSERVED TO HAVE LOOSENED/BACKED OUT APPROXIMATELY SIX (6) WEEKS POSTOPERATIVELY. THE INDEX SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2025. THE SURGEON REPORTED THAT INTRAOPERATIVE FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGING (C-ARM) CONFIRMED THE LOCKING COVER WAS FLUSH AND FULLY SEATED AT THE TIME OF IMPLANTATION. AT APPROXIMATELY SIX WEEKS POSTOPERATIVELY, FOLLOW-UP IMAGING DEMONSTRATED THAT THE LOCKING COVER HAD MIGRATED/BACKED OUT FROM ITS ORIGINAL SEATED POSITION.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24488463 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 15, 2025Migration; Migration

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY FUSION (ACDF) SPINE SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025 UTILIZING SEASPINE/ORTHOFIX'S WAVEFORM C AND SHORELINE ACS SYSTEMS. ON (B)(6) 2025, SEASPINE/ORTHOFIX WAS NOTIFIED THAT THE SHORELINE ACS NO-PROFILE LOCKING COVER HAD PREMATURELY DISENGAGED FROM THE WAVEFORM C NO-PROFILE INTERBODY CONSTRUCT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 22507315 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2025Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    A PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY FUSION (ACDF) SPINAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. ON (B)(6) 2025, IT WAS OBSERVED DURING ROUTINE POSTOPERATIVE FOLLOW UP THAT THE NO PROFILE LOCKING COVER SEPARATED FROM THE NO PROFILE SPACER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22168864 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page