Skip to content

Shoreline ACS 85-2107Recalls & reported problems

Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · 7mm, Locking Cover · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Shoreline ACS (16)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10889981125080), received between Aug 25, 2023 and Sep 21, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Accessory Incompatible” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Accessory Incompatible1
  • Fracture1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Premature Separation1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 21, 2026Accessory Incompatible

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 50846941 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2026Fracture

    Orthofix was made aware on 12 AUG 2026 that a patient underwent spinal surgery consisting of the Shoreline ACS system. The index surgery occurred on (b)(6) 2026. It was reported that an 85-2107 7mm, Locking Cover fractured into the interbody intra-operatively and the threaded portion was left in the interbody. The fracture occurred when the surgeon tried to advance the 85-2107 7mm, Locking Cover using the Locking Handle. According to the reporter, the 85-2107 7mm, Locking Cover did not advance and was not seated properly. Since the interbody was already fixated at C6-7 with the screws, the surgeon elected to leave the construct in place and not remove the fractured threaded portion of the Locking Cover. No patient injuries or additional medical intervention were reported. Per the reporter, the patient is recovering well.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50693454 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2024Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    SEASPINE BECAME AWARE ON 25 APR 2024, THAT A REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2024, DUE TO LOOSENING OF A LOCKING COVER AND SCREW FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19308682 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Premature Separation; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Premature Separation

    THIS EVENT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED ON 3012120772-2023-00009. THIS REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION OF THE 85-2107 7MM, LOCKING COVER INVOLVED IN THE EVENT. SEASPINE WAS MADE AWARE ON 03 APRIL 2023 THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT SPINAL SURGERY CONSISTING OF SEASPINE' S SHORELINE SYSTEM. THE INDEX SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2022. THE X-RAY PROVIDED APPEARS TO SHOW THAT A SCREW LOOSENED POST-OPERATIVELY. ON 11 APRIL 2023 THE REPORTER NOTED THAT AT THE 3-MONTH CHECKUP, THE SCREW HAD STARTED TO BACK OUT ALREADY AS OBSERVED ON A LATERAL X-RAY. AT A SUBSEQUENT CHECKUP ABOUT A MONTH AGO THE SURGEON OBSERVED THAT THE SCREW HAD BECOME COMPLETELY DISASSOCIATED WITH THE REST OF THE CONSTRUCT. THE REPORTER ADDED THAT THE CONSTRUCT SPAN FROM C5-C7. THE C5 AND C6 VERTEBRAL BODIES BOTH APPEAR TO HAVE SOME COLLAPSE TO THEM. THEY APPEAR TO BE MUCH SHORTER IN HEIGHT THAN THE ADJACENT LEVELS, MAKING THEM WONDER ABOUT BONE QUALITY. ALSO, DURING THE PROCEDURE THE RESIDENT TOOK A TRAJECTORY INTO C6 THAT DR. LENNARSON DIDN'T LIKE SO HE REVISED A COUPLE OF SCREWS DURING THE INDEX PROCEDURE. A REVISION SURGERY THEN TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17623442 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page