Shoreline ACS 86-0010Recalls & reported problems
Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · Inserter · Class 2
All models of Shoreline ACS (16)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10889981126889), received between Aug 5, 2024 and Mar 6, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture7
- Off-Label Use1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Foreign Body In Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 6, 2026Fracture
SEASPINE/ORTHOFIX BECAME AWARE ON 05 FEB 2026 THAT THE TIP OF A SHORELINE ACS INSERTER FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY WHEN INSERTING THE WAVEFORM C INTERBODY. THE FRACTURED TIP COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED FROM THE INTERBODY AND WAS LEFT IN-SITU. AS A RESULT, THE LOCKING COVER WAS UNABLE TO BE ADDED TO THE CONSTRUCT. AS THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT THE LOCKING COVER, ORTHOFIX/SEASPINE CANNOT GUARANTEE THE STABILITY OF THE CONSTRUCT POST-OPERATIVELY. NO PATIENT INJURIES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24533727 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
SEASPINE/ORTHOFIX BECAME AWARE ON 16 OCT 2025 THAT THE TIP OF A SHORELINE ACS INSERTER FRACTURED INTRA-OPERATIVELY WHEN INSERTING THE WAVEFORM C INTERBODY. THE DISTRIBUTOR REP REPORTED THAT ALL OF THE FRACTURED PIECES WERE RETRIEVED, HOWEVER, THE LOCKING COVER WAS UNABLE TO BE ADDED TO THE CONSTRUCT. AS THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT THE LOCKING COVER, ORTHOFIX/SEASPINE CANNOT GUARANTEE THE STABILITY OF THE CONSTRUCT POST-OPERATIVELY; THEREFORE, BASED ON THIS RISK CHARACTERIZATION, THE EVENT WAS DETERMINED TO BE REPORTABLE. NO PATIENT INJURIES WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23523333 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2025Fracture; Fracture
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT SPINAL SURGERY CONSISTING OF SHORELINE ACS AND WAVEFORM C SYSTEMS. THE TIP OF THE SHORELINE INSERTER SNAPPED AT THE THREADS WHILE IMPLANTING THE WAVEFORM C INTERBODY. THE BROKEN TIP WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE IMPLANT AND THE CONSTRUCT WAS LEFT IN-SITU WITHOUT A LOCKING COVER. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE REPORTER CONFIRMS THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, AND THE ISSUE DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22031462 ↗MalfunctionMar 26, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THE SURGEON REPORTED THE TIP OF THE SHORELINE ACS INSERTER BROKE WHILE PERFORMING SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE TIP OF THE INNER SHAFT OF THE INSERTER SHEARED OFF IN THE FACE OF THE IMPLANT. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE TRAUMA THAT WOULD BE CAUSED BY REMOVING THE IMPLANT WOULD BE TOO GREAT TO DO SO, THEREFORE THE IMPLANT WAS LEFT IN-SITU. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. CUSTOMER CONFIRMS THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND THE ISSUE DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21702052 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THE SURGEON REPORTED THE TIP OF THE SHORELINE ACS INSERTER BROKE WHILE PERFORMING SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE TIP OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF AS THE SURGEON WAS GETTING THE CAGE IN PLACE. THE SURGEON LEFT THE CAGE WITH THE INSERTER TIP IN PLACE WITHOUT THE LOCKING COVER. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. CUSTOMER CONFIRMS THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND THE ISSUE DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21578029 ↗MalfunctionJan 20, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THE SURGEON REPORTED THE TIP OF THE SHORELINE ACS INSERTER BROKE WHILE PERFORMING SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE CAGE/PLATE WAS BEING IMPACTED INTO THE C6-C7 DISC SPACE WHEN THE THREADED TIP BROKE IN THE CAGE. THE TIP BECAME STUCK IN THE CAGE AND THE CAGE WITH THE BROKEN TIP WAS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO PLACE THE LOCKING COVER ON THE PLATE. THE CUSTOMER STATES THERE WAS A BACKUP AVAILABLE, BUT THE SURGEON WAS PLEASED WITH THE SCREW PURCHASE AND DECIDED TO LEAVE AS IS. THE EVENT DID NOT LEAD TO A CLINICALLY RELEVANT INCREASE IN THE DURATION OF THE SURGICAL PROCEDURE AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. CUSTOMER CONFIRMS THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY AND THE ISSUE DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21194464 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THE SURGEON REPORTED THE TIP OF THE SHORELINE ACS INSERTER BROKE WHILE PERFORMING SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE DISTAL TIP OF THE INSERTER WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. CUSTOMER CONFIRMS THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY, NO DELAY IN SURGERY AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE ISSUE DID NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL MEDICAL OR SURGICAL TREATMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21127982 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ON (B)(6) 2024 A PATIENT UNDERWENT SPINAL SURGERY CONSISTING OF SEASPINE'S SHORELINE ANTERIOR CERVICAL FIXATION SYSTEM. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE INSERTER BROKE OFF IN THE INTERBODY IMPLANT. THE SURGEON OPTED TO LEAVE THE IMPLANT WITH THE BROKEN INSERTER TIP IN-SITU. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19911748 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page