Skip to content

Olympus A22266CRecalls & reported problems

OLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Class 2

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 14042761036891), received between Aug 26, 2024 and Aug 26, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 2 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jun 8, 2023Open, Classified

    Additional Caution statements in IFU: (1) Due to complaints where the loop wire at the distal end of the HF resection electrode broke after getting in contact with metal objects, such as other endoscopic equipment, implants or stents. As a result, fragments can fall inside the patient and must be retrieved. (2) The second Caution refers to the risk of sparkover when getting in contact with metal parts as this can cause uncontrolled heating of the HF-resection electrode and may result in damage and breakage to the HF-resection electrode tip

    Z-2413-2023 · Root cause: Process design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2024Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE RESECTION ELECTRODE TIP BROKE WHILE BEING IGNITED AND CYLINDER CAME OFF. THE CYLINDER WAS RETRIEVED. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE (TURP) PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20072661 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2024Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED, THE RESECTION ELECTRODE TIP BROKE WHILE BEING IGNITED AND CYLINDER CAME OFF. THE CYLINDER WAS RETRIEVED. THE ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A THERAPEUTIC TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE (TURP) PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SIMILAR DEVICE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20072511 ↗

Other Hysteroscope (And Accessories) devices

All Hysteroscope (And Accessories) devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.