FORZA 89-0153Recalls & reported problems
Orthofix US LLC · 9MM MONOLITHIC TAMP · Class 1 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 18257200077076), received between Nov 11, 2025 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
ON OCTOBER 30TH, I WAS SUPPORTING A SPINAL SURGERY CASE AT (B)(6). THE SURGEON PERFORMED A THREE-LEVEL SPONDYLOLISTHESIS PROCEDURE AND PLANNED TO USE FORZA TI CAGES AT TWO LEVELS. NORMALLY, THE CLINIC USES FORZA PTC CAGES, BUT DUE TO LIMITED AVAILABILITY IN CERTAIN SIZES, WE DECIDED TO USE THE FORZA TI FOR THIS CASE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SCRUB NURSE ATTACHED A FORZA TI CAGE TO THE 11MM CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT. WHEN THE SURGEON BEGAN INSERTING THE IMPLANT WITH THE MALLET, THE CAGE BECAME LOOSE. UPON REMOVAL, WE OBSERVED THAT PART OF THE SIDE TEETH OF THE CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT HAD BROKEN OFF. IN ADDITION, THE THREADED INSERT FRACTURED, AND A FRAGMENT REMAINED LODGED INSIDE THE CAGE WHICH MADE IT UNUSABLE. THE SURGEON HAD TO LOCATE AND RETRIEVE THE MISSING METAL FRAGMENTS FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT, WHICH FORTUNATELY WERE ALL FOUND. AFTER THIS INCIDENT, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED INSERTION AGAIN USING THE OTHER 11MM CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT AND A NEW CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE. ALTHOUGH THE CAGE ATTACHED PROPERLY, THE SECOND IMPLANT SHAFT BROKE IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE FIRST ONE. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO A MIX-UP, THE SCRUB NURSE MISTAKENLY HANDED THE 9MM TAMP INSTEAD OF THE CORRECT 11MM TAMP. THIS RESU
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23524057 ↗
Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices
- AML EXCEL 2001-42-000Depuy (Ireland) · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT2,009 reports
- NA 03.010.523Synthes GmbH · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,208 reports
- EXPRESSEW 214141Medos International Sàrl · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT1,166 reports
- N/A 9560524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT866 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-104Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument831 reports
- INHANCE 6500-11-102Depuy (Ireland) · Orthopedic manual surgical instrument567 reports
- R3 71364450Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT520 reports
- N/A 9561524Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT494 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.