Skip to content

FORZA 89-0153Recalls & reported problems

Orthofix US LLC · 9MM MONOLITHIC TAMP · Class 1 · Implant

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 18257200077076), received between Nov 11, 2025 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 11, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    ON OCTOBER 30TH, I WAS SUPPORTING A SPINAL SURGERY CASE AT (B)(6). THE SURGEON PERFORMED A THREE-LEVEL SPONDYLOLISTHESIS PROCEDURE AND PLANNED TO USE FORZA TI CAGES AT TWO LEVELS. NORMALLY, THE CLINIC USES FORZA PTC CAGES, BUT DUE TO LIMITED AVAILABILITY IN CERTAIN SIZES, WE DECIDED TO USE THE FORZA TI FOR THIS CASE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SCRUB NURSE ATTACHED A FORZA TI CAGE TO THE 11MM CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT. WHEN THE SURGEON BEGAN INSERTING THE IMPLANT WITH THE MALLET, THE CAGE BECAME LOOSE. UPON REMOVAL, WE OBSERVED THAT PART OF THE SIDE TEETH OF THE CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT HAD BROKEN OFF. IN ADDITION, THE THREADED INSERT FRACTURED, AND A FRAGMENT REMAINED LODGED INSIDE THE CAGE WHICH MADE IT UNUSABLE. THE SURGEON HAD TO LOCATE AND RETRIEVE THE MISSING METAL FRAGMENTS FROM INSIDE THE PATIENT, WHICH FORTUNATELY WERE ALL FOUND. AFTER THIS INCIDENT, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED INSERTION AGAIN USING THE OTHER 11MM CURVED IMPLANT SHAFT AND A NEW CAGE OF THE SAME SIZE. ALTHOUGH THE CAGE ATTACHED PROPERLY, THE SECOND IMPLANT SHAFT BROKE IN THE SAME MANNER AS THE FIRST ONE. ADDITIONALLY, DUE TO A MIX-UP, THE SCRUB NURSE MISTAKENLY HANDED THE 9MM TAMP INSTEAD OF THE CORRECT 11MM TAMP. THIS RESU

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23524057 ↗

Other ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices

All ORTHOPEDIC MANUAL SURGICAL INSTRUMENT devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.