Skip to content

Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6623515Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW PK2 G6623515 SA S-D 3.5mm x 15mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Divergence Anterior Cervical Fusion System (15)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20643169338801), received between Dec 5, 2017 and May 24, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • Dysphagia/ Odynophagia1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 24, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) VIA A MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED WITH A SCREW IN AN UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY FOR AN UNKNOWN SPINAL INDICATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREW PULLED OUT (CAME OUT). THE PATIENT HAD DIFFICULTY SWALLOWING POSTOPERATIVELY. THE SCREW WAS PARTIALLY EXP LANTED. THE SCREW MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ ANTICIPATED.

    Patient problems: Dysphagia/ Odynophagia

    MAUDE report 19389681 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2017 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR CERVICAL DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION AT C4/5 DUE TO CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY. POST-OP, AT THE TIME OF X-RAY INSPECTION OF THE ONE MONTH AFTER SURGERY, SCREW BACK OUT WAS OBSERVED. CT WAS TAKEN TO CONFIRM AND IT WAS JUDGED THAT THE SCREW HAD BACKED OUT AT CRANIAL SIDE OF C4/5. IN REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THE LOCKING CAP WAS LOCKED, BUT THE LOCKING CAP WAS NOT PUT ON THE RELEVANT SCREW. THE SURGEON RELEASED THE LOCK MECHANISM AND TIGHTENED THE SCREW, AND THEN TURNED THE LOCKING CAP TO CONCLUDE. THE HOSPITALIZATION PERIOD WAS PROLONGED TO DUE REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 7081870 ↗

Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices

All Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page