Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6623515Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW PK2 G6623515 SA S-D 3.5mm x 15mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Divergence Anterior Cervical Fusion System (15)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20643169338801), received between Dec 5, 2017 and May 24, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Discomfort1
- Dysphagia/ Odynophagia1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 24, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) VIA A MEDTRONIC REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT PREVIOUSLY IMPLANTED WITH A SCREW IN AN UNKNOWN SPINAL THERAPY FOR AN UNKNOWN SPINAL INDICATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT SCREW PULLED OUT (CAME OUT). THE PATIENT HAD DIFFICULTY SWALLOWING POSTOPERATIVELY. THE SCREW WAS PARTIALLY EXP LANTED. THE SCREW MAY NEED TO BE REPLACED. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ ANTICIPATED.
Patient problems: Dysphagia/ Odynophagia
MAUDE report 19389681 ↗InjuryDec 5, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration or Expulsion of Device
IT WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2017 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT ANTERIOR CERVICAL DECOMPRESSION AND FUSION AT C4/5 DUE TO CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY. POST-OP, AT THE TIME OF X-RAY INSPECTION OF THE ONE MONTH AFTER SURGERY, SCREW BACK OUT WAS OBSERVED. CT WAS TAKEN TO CONFIRM AND IT WAS JUDGED THAT THE SCREW HAD BACKED OUT AT CRANIAL SIDE OF C4/5. IN REVISION SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THE LOCKING CAP WAS LOCKED, BUT THE LOCKING CAP WAS NOT PUT ON THE RELEVANT SCREW. THE SURGEON RELEASED THE LOCK MECHANISM AND TIGHTENED THE SCREW, AND THEN TURNED THE LOCKING CAP TO CONCLUDE. THE HOSPITALIZATION PERIOD WAS PROLONGED TO DUE REVISION SURGERY.
Patient problems: Discomfort
MAUDE report 7081870 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page