anchor, Bag-Alone TRS070Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · ANCHOR BAG ALONE, TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, BAG SIZE 175 ML, PORT SIZE 10 MM · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20653405986079), received between Aug 30, 2021 and Aug 30, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Frayed” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Frayed1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 30, 2021Material Frayed; Material Frayed
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE, TRS070, WAS BEING USED DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY ON APPROXIMATELY (B)(6) 2021 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED WE HAVE HAD AN ISSUE IN THEATRES WITH ONE OF THESE RETRIEVAL BAGS. WHILST TRYING TO REMOVE THE BAG FROM A PATIENTS ABDOMEN VIA THE UMBILICAL PORT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, THE BAG SPLIT. THE RESULT OF THEN LED TO A GALLSTONE FALLING BACK INTO THE ABDOMEN AND THE GALLBLADDER HISTOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BECOMING AT RISK OF BEING RETAINED. ON INSPECTION OF THE BAG, IT SEEMED LIKE THE MATERIAL HAD FRAYED THEN SPLIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED AS BEING COMPLETED WITH NO DELAY AND NO INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR HOSPITALIZATION OF THE PATIENT. FURTHER ASSESSMENT INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED; HOWEVER, TO DATE WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED AN ANSWER. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY COMPONENT OR FRAGMENT OF THE DEVICE COMING LOOSE OR BEING RETAINED IN THE PATIENT AND THE SPECIMEN WAS REMOVED AS THE REPORTER STATES THE SPECIMEN WAS AT RISK OF BEING RETAINED, NOT THAT IT WAS RETAINED. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12386191 ↗
Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices
- HIGH DEFINITION LCD MONITOR OEV262HOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,937 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-12EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,886 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-10EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,086 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10BTCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall955 reports
- PDB OMS-PDB1000Covidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery859 reports
- VISERA 4K UHD CAMERA CONTROL UNIT OLYMPUS OTV-S400Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery777 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10SBCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall697 reports
- Spacemaker SMBTTRNDXCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery590 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page