ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM TRS190SB2Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, BAG SIZE 1800 ML, PORT SIZE 15 MM · Class 2
All models of ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20653405986130), received between Jun 5, 2023 and Apr 6, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Crack1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Material Frayed1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Bowel Perforation1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 6, 2026Crack; Detachment of Device or Device Component
A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER THAT THE TRS190SB2, TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM,BAG SIZE 1800 ML,PORT SIZE 15 MM DEVICE WAS USED IN A ROBOTIC SPLENECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 26, AND ¿CUSTOMER WAS USING AN ANCHOR BAG IN A CASE AND IT BROKE OFF INSIDE THE PATIENT¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATE DEVICE. THROUGH FURTHER ASSESSMENT A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ¿THERE WAS NO REPORTING OF FRAGMENTING FROM ACCOUNT. THE BAG DID FALL AND GET STUCK IN THE PATIENT.¿. THE CUSTOMER STATED, ¿DUE TO THE SHAFT BREAKING THE BAG WAS STUCK HE ATTEMPTED TO USE THE 15MM ENDOCATCH BAG. IT GOT STUCK INSIDE THE PATIENT AND CRACKED/BROKE. IT WAS BAGGED AND PLACED IN OFFICE¿, INDICATING THAT THE DEVICE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION WAS PROVIDED DESPITE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24788704 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2024Material Frayed; Material Frayed
A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF A CUSTOMER THAT THE TRS190SB2, ANCR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, 15MM, 1800ML (3/BX) DEVICE WAS BEING USED DURING A HYSTERECTOMY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024, AND ¿FRAYING/SHREDDED FIBERS FROM SPECIMEN BAG THAT WERE SEEN INSIDE THE PATIENT ABDOMEN USING ROBOTIC CAMERA. THIS OCCURRED IN 1 CASE WITH 1 SPECIMEN BAG.¿. THROUGH FOLLOW-UP ASSESSMENT, THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE INDICATED "THE STAFF TOLD ME THEY REMOVED ALL FRAGMENTS THEY COULD SEE. THEY EXPLORED AND THEY BELIEVE THEY REMOVED EVERYTHING FROM THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL CAVITY.". THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT THE USE OF AN ALTERNATE DEVICE AND NO REPORTED DELAY. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL/SURGICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19816694 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2023Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE, TRS190SB2, ANCR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, 15MM, 1800ML, WAS BEING USED DURING ABDOMINAL SURGERY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿SURGEON WAS TRYING TO GET THE SPECIMEN IN THE BAG AND WHILE DOING SO THE FORCEP WENT THROUGH THE BAG AND PUNCTURED THE COLON. SURGEON STATED THERE WAS A LARGE TEAR IN THE BAG. IT IS UNKNOWN IF IT WAS TORN PRIOR TO DEPLOYMENT. REPAIR SUTURE OF PUNCTURED COLON/BOWEL.¿. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE ¿PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF THE SAME ALTERNATE DEVICE, AND THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS ¿GOOD¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION TO PATIENT OR USER. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE REPORTED INJURY DUE THE PATIENT¿S COLON BEING PUNCTURED.
Patient problems: Bowel Perforation
MAUDE report 17059108 ↗
Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices
- HIGH DEFINITION LCD MONITOR OEV262HOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,937 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-12EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,886 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-10EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,086 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10BTCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall955 reports
- PDB OMS-PDB1000Covidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery859 reports
- VISERA 4K UHD CAMERA CONTROL UNIT OLYMPUS OTV-S400Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery777 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10SBCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall697 reports
- Spacemaker SMBTTRNDXCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery590 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page