anchor Tissue Retrieval System TRS-TV-25Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, BAG SIZE 6000 ML, TRANSVAGINAL · Class 2
All models of ANCHOR TISSUE RETRIEVAL SYSTEM (8)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 20653405986178), received between Oct 1, 2021 and Oct 1, 2021 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 1, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE TRS-TV-25 WAS USED DURING A ROBOTIC HYSTERECTOMY ON APPROXIMATELY (B)(6) 2021 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿THE KICKSTAND BROKE OFF DURING PROCEDURE¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT. FURTHER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONING FOUND THAT THE COMPONENT, THE METAL ARM, THAT RELEASES THE BAG HAD FALLEN INTO THE PATIENT AND WAS RETRIEVED WITH ROBOTIC GRASPERS AND PLACED IN THE BAG. THE PROCEDURE IS REPORTED AS HAVING BEEN COMPLETED AS PLANNED WITH A 5-MINUTE DELAY. THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE ALSO REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON HAD GRABBED THE ARM OF THE DEVICE TO HELP OPEN THE BAG AND THAT THIS IS THE POSSIBLE REASON FOR THE FAILURE. THE PATIENT HAS BEEN REPORTED AS DOING ¿WELL¿. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12561097 ↗
Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices
- HIGH DEFINITION LCD MONITOR OEV262HOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,937 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-12EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,886 reports
- HD AUTOCLAVABLE CAMERA HEAD OTV-S7ProH-HD-10EOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1,086 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10BTCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall955 reports
- PDB OMS-PDB1000Covidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery859 reports
- VISERA 4K UHD CAMERA CONTROL UNIT OLYMPUS OTV-S400Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery777 reports
- Auto Suture OMS-T10SBCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery1 recall697 reports
- Spacemaker SMBTTRNDXCovidien LP · Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery590 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page