Skip to content

Lapra-TY KA200Recalls & reported problems

Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · Lapra-TY Suture Clip Applier 33cm Shaft Length -11mm Diameter · Class 1

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705036012648), received between Jun 6, 2018 and Oct 29, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Open or Close” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 2 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Open or Close5
  • Failure to Fire3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Slipped2
  • Leak/Splash2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Code Available3
  • Fever2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Abdominal Pain1
  • Abscess1
  • Failure to Anastomose1
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close; Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE AND THAT DURING EQUIPMENT CHECKING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT OPEN AND CLOSE. NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23413154 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 29, 2025Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close; Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE AND THAT DURING EQUIPMENT CHECKING, THE DEVICE WOULD NOT OPEN AND CLOSE. NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23413057 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 22, 2025Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close; Failure to Fire; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN SURGERY, THE DEVICES COULD NOT PERFORM LIGATION, AND THEY WOULD OPEN UP. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21882945 ↗
  • InjuryMar 2, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    THIS REPORT IS BEING FILED AFTER THE REVIEW OF A CLINICAL EVALUATION REPORT (CER) FROM A RELATED RESEARCH ACTIVITY DATABASE (DDRA) FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURES. POST-PROCEDURE BLEEDING HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE REPORTED COMPLICATION AS PER ICD-10 CATEGORIZATION EXPERIENCED BY THE FOLLOWING WITH CORRESPONDING INTERVENTION: 137 PATIENTS HAD POST-PROCEDURE COMPLICATION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WITH USE OF THE DEVICE AND BEFORE THE DISCHARGE OF THE INDEX ADMISSION WAS DEFINED USING DIAGNOSIS CODES (SEE APPENDIX TABLE 1). POST-PROCEDURE SURGICAL SITE INFECTION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE REPORTED COMPLICATION AS PER ICD-10 CATEGORIZATION EXPERIENCED BY THE FOLLOWING WITH CORRESPONDING INTERVENTION: 15 PATIENTS HAD POST-PROCEDURE COMPLICATION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WITH USE OF THE DEVICE AND BEFORE THE DISCHARGE OF THE INDEX ADMISSION WAS DEFINED USING DIAGNOSIS CODES (SEE APPENDIX TABLE 1). POST-PROCEDURE WOUND DISRUPTION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS THE REPORTED COMPLICATION AS PER ICD10 CATEGORIZATION EXPERIENCED BY THE FOLLOWING WITH CORRESPONDING INTERVENTION: 12 PATIENTS HAD POST-PROCEDURE COMPLICATION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WITH USE OF THE DEVICE AND BEFORE THE DISCHARGE O

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 16467865 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 25, 2021Difficult to Open or Close; Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ROBOT ASSISTED SACROCOLPOPEXY, THE HANDLE DIDN'T RELEASE TO GRAB THE LAPRATY CLIPS. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12368821 ↗
  • InjuryJan 23, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING REVIEW OF A JOURNAL ARTICLE, TITLE: PROXIMAL LEAKAGE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: AN ANALYSIS OF PREOPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE PREDICTORS ON 1738 CONSECUTIVE PROCEDURES. AUTHOR/S: GIOVANNI CESANA, STEFANO CIOFFI, RICCARDO GIORGI, ROBERTA VILLA1, MATTEO UCCELLI, FRANCESCA CICCARESE, GIORGIO CASTELLO, BRUNO SCOTTO AND STEFANO OLMI. CITATION: OBES SURG (2018) 28:627¿635; DOI 10.1007/S11695-017-2907-Z; PUBLISHED ONLINE: 24 AUGUST 2017. THE PURPOSE OF THIS RETROSPECTIVE STUDY WAS TO SEARCH FOR PREDICTIVE FACTORS FOR PROXIMAL LEAKAGE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY (LSG) IN A LARGE COHORT FROM A SINGLE REFERRAL CENTER. FROM JANUARY 2008 TO OCTOBER 2016, ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND THIRTY-EIGHT PATIENTS (MEDIAN AGE 41.0 (33.0 TO 49.0) YEARS, MALE N=428, FEMALE N=1310) WHO UNDERWENT LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY WERE ANALYZED. LSG WAS PERFORMED USING FOUR TROCARS. THE GREAT CURVATURE WAS DISSECTED AND ISOLATED FROM THE GASTROCOLIC LIGAMENT AND THE SPLENOCOLIC LIGAMENT THROUGH AN ULTRASONIC DEVICE (HARMONIC ACE, ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY INC., CINCINNATI, OHIO) OR A RADIOFREQUENCY SEALER DEVICE (LIGASURE MARYLAND JAW, MEDTRONIC, DUBLIN, IRELAND; OR C

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Abscess; Failure to Anastomose; Fever; No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9624975 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 16, 2019Difficult to Open or Close

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE JAWS OF THE INSTRUMENT WERE NOT OPENING AND CLOSING. NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8253431 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2018Leak/Splash; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC ROBOT-ASSISTED TOTAL PROSTATECTOMY, THE PLACED CLIP SLID DURING SUTURING AFTER FIXED ON THE MONOCRYL. THE DEVICE WAS USED ON THE ANASTOMOSED SITE BETWEEN THE URETHRA AND THE BLADDER. THE HOSPITALIZATION WAS PROLONGED SINCE LEAKAGE OCCURRED AND THE CATHETER COULD NOT BE REMOVED. NO BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Fever; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7590905 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2018Leak/Splash; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC ROBOT-ASSISTED TOTAL PROSTATECTOMY, THE PLACED CLIP SLID DURING SUTURING AFTER FIXED ON THE MONOCRYL. THE DEVICE WAS USED ON THE ANASTOMOSED SITE BETWEEN THE URETHRA AND THE BLADDER. THE HOSPITALIZATION WAS PROLONGED SINCE LEAKAGE OCCURRED. NO BLOOD TRANSFUSION WAS REQUIRED. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 7575150 ↗

Other Applier, surgical, clip devices

All Applier, surgical, clip devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.