Skip to content

Mini Step MS101008Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Dilator and Cannula · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20884521082745), received between Nov 13, 2018 and Jan 3, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Difficult to Insert1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 3, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC PEDIATRIC APPENDECTOMY, A PIECE OF THE RUBBER REDUCER SEAL DETECTED AND WAS FOUND IN THE BODY CAVITY AND WAS RETRIEVED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18436950 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2022Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, DURING EXCHANGE OF INSTRUMENTS, THE RING SHAPE OF THE TROCAR BROKE OFF AND DISLODGED IN THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO USE A GRASPER TO PICK THE COMPONENT OUT OF THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15520257 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 25, 2019Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRE-OPERATIVELY, THE SURGEON STATED THAT THE INSUFFLATION NEEDLE WAS DIFFICULT TO ENGAGE/MOVE FORWARD INTO THE DILATOR. IT WAS FELT THAT IT GETS STUCK. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 8552548 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 26, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE SHEATH RIPPED WHEN THE SURGEON PULLED OUT THE VERRESS NEEDLE, NOT REALLY A DAMAGED SEAL BUT A RIPPED SHEATH. IT WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8101643 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2018Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHILE THE DEVICE WAS BEING APPLIED TO THE ABDOMINAL WALL DURING CATHETER INSERTION IN A LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE, THE CANNULA BROKE. THE SURGEON INSERTED THE NEEDLE INTO THE RADIALLY EXPANDABLE SLEEVE AFTER INSUFFLATION. THE SLEEVE AND NEEDLE WERE INSERTED NORMALLY INTO THE PATIENT TO DEPLOY THE SLEEVE, BUT THE SLEEVE ESSENTIALLY WAS STUCK TO THE NEEDLE AND BUCKLED OR BUNCHED UP AS THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE NEEDLE. THEY TRIED USING TWO OTHER UNITS OF THE SAME LOT BUT SIMILAR STICKING MALFUNCTION OCCURRED. THEY USED ANOTHER DEVICE OF THE SAME LOT TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8067908 ↗

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page