Skip to content

Step S110000Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Insufflation Needle · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20884521090849), received between Nov 17, 2017 and Dec 25, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K961940); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Bent1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Noise, Audible1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • Hematoma1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 25, 2025Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PREOPERATIVELY OF LAPAROSCOPIC GASTROPEXY, THE JAWS OF THE TWO CLIP APPLIERS WOULD NOT OPEN ALL THE WAY AND WOULD NOT FIRE. ADDITIONALLY, THE CANNULA BROKE FOR BOTH THE PORTS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED ON THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23892194 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS, WHILE INSERTING THE LAPAROSCOPIC PORTS, THE SHORT VERESS NEEDLE HAD BEEN REPLACED WITH A SUBSTITUTION NEEDLE THAT WAS LONGER THAN WHAT WAS NORMALLY USED. THE NEEDLE HIT THE PATIENT'S INNER ABDOMEN AND CAUSED AN INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA OF THE SIGMOID COLON. AFTER REPAIRING, THE COLON WAS INSPECTED DIRECTLY; THERE WAS NO FULL-THICKNESS INJURY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED FOR 30 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: Hematoma

    MAUDE report 20919450 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 18, 2023Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PREOPERATIVELY, WHEN PACKAGED OPENED, NEEDLE WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18346278 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 29, 2021Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE CANNULA BROKE WHEN THE DEVICE WAS OPENED. THIS HAPPENED PRIOR TO PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12085405 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2019Difficult to Insert; Noise, Audible; Difficult to Insert; Noise, Audible

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING A PEDIATRIC LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL PROCEDURE, BOTH DEVICE MADE A STRANGE NOISE, AND THERE IS SOME PROBLEM INSERTING THE OBTURATOR INTO THE SLEEVE. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9315318 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 23, 2019Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHILE INSERTING THE TROCAR THROUGH THE ABDOMINAL WALL DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, THE SURGEON WOULD INSERT THE NEEDLE, BUT COULD NOT REMOVE IT BECAUSE IT WAS TOO TIGHT. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE WAS TOO BIG FOR THE SHEATH. TWO OTHER SEPARATE SHEATHS WERE BROUGHT, BUT BOTH WERE RIPPED/BUCKLED IN WHEN IT WAS ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE NEEDLE. THE SURGEON PERSISTED WITH THE TROCARS TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8819741 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 17, 2017Bent; Break; Bent; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: OCCURRED DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC GONADECTOMY PROCEDURE. UPON INSERTION INTO THE BODY, THE NEEDLE BENT. THE CANNULA BROKE. IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND COMPLETE THE CASE, THE SURGEON USED ANOTHER NEEDLE WITH THE SAME ANGLE, FORCE, AND TECHNIQUE AND IT WORKED FINE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM. THE PATIENT OUTCOME IS ALIVE, NO INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7040506 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K961940. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1387-2023 · Mar 1, 2023 · Open, Classified
    Step Bladeless Trocars, 10 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve and 5 - 10 mm reducer, Product Number S101010

Other Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices

All Laparoscope, general & plastic surgery devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page