Medi-Trace Cadence 22660RRecalls & reported problems
Cardinal Health, Inc. · Adult Multi-Function Defibrillation Electrodes, Radiotransparent · Class 2
All models of Medi-Trace Cadence (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20884527022349), received between Jan 20, 2021 and Dec 14, 2021 — classified as 1 death, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Peeled/Delaminated” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Peeled/Delaminated2
- Arcing1
- Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation1
- Fire1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn1
- Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 14, 2021Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT HALF OF THE CONDUCTIVE JELLY APPEARS TO STICK TO THE DISPOSABLE PART INSTEAD OF ON THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED STATED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM OR DELAY. THIS ISSUE OCCURRED DURING A PATIENT CASE AND WAS NOTICED PRIOR TO PUTTING THE PADS ON THE PATIENT; THE PRODUCT WAS NOT USED. THE CUSTOMER THEN OPENED EVERYTHING THEY HAD LEFT IN STOCK. THESE WERE DEFIB PADS THAT THE CUSTOMER HAPPENED TO FIND IN THEIR WAREHOUSE AFTER THEIR CURRENT SUPPLIER HAD A BACKORDER. THE DEFIB PADS WERE LAST ORDERED FROM US IN 2019. THE CUSTOMER STATED THAT THEY KNEW THE PRODUCT WAS PAST THE EXPIRATION DATE (AUGUST 2020) BUT SINCE THEY DID NOT HAVE ANY OTHER OPTION, THEY TRIED TO USE THEM UNTIL THEY NOTICED THAT THE JELLY WAS NOT WORKING/WAS BROKEN.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13006426 ↗DeathFeb 18, 2021Fire; Arcing; Fire; Arcing
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED A FIRE DURING DEFIBRILLATION IN WHICH THE PATIENT SUSTAINED 2ND AND 3RD DEGREE BURNS TO THE RIGHT UPPER SHOULDER, RIGHT UPPER ARM, HEAD, AND FACIAL AREA. THE CUSTOMER FURTHER STATED THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN EXTENSIVE LOWER GI BLEED. THE FACILITY ACTIVATED A CODE HEMORRHAGE AS THE PATIENT WAS HYPOTENSIVE. DURING THAT TIME THE PATIENT WENT INTO VTACH AND VFIB ARREST AND A CODE BLUE WAS CALLED CONCOMITANTLY WITH THE CODE HEMORRHAGE. THE PATIENT WAS DEFIBRILLATED FIVE TIMES. ON THE SIXTH TIME THERE WAS AN OBSERVABLE ARC/BRIGHT LIGHT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THE DEFIBRILLATION ELECTRODE PAD, THE MONITORING PADS, AND THE EKG CABLES (FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER) IN THE AREA THAT EXTENDED TO THE PATIENT'S UPPER RIGHT SHOULDER AREA. IT QUICKLY WENT INTO A SPARK THEN FLAMES WHICH ENGULFED THE PATIENTS RIGHT UPPER SHOULDER, RIGHT UPPER ARM, HEAD, AND FACIAL AREA. THE FIRE WAS PUT OUT BY THE STAFF IN 3-6 SECONDS AND RESUSCITATION CONTINUED. THE PATIENT WAS REINTUBATED AND THE CODE CONTINUED FOR 40-45 MINUTES WITHOUT THE RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION. THE PATIENT WAS PRONOUNCED EXPIRED. THE FACILITY DID HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN OF THE SKIN IMPAIRMENT. THE FACILITY REFUSED TO PRO
Patient problems: Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn; Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn
MAUDE report 11345724 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2021Peeled/Delaminated; Peeled/Delaminated
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT AFTER TESTING THE DEFIB PADS THEY NOTICED DISCOLORATION ON THE APEX SIDE. UPON REVIEW OF THE PHOTO THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER, ONE PAD HAD AN AREA OF GEL DELAMINATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11343128 ↗MalfunctionJan 20, 2021Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation; Failure to Deliver Shock/Stimulation
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE CADENCE DEFIB PAD WAS UNABLE TO DELIVER A SHOCK TO A PATIENT REQUIRING DEFIBRILLATION DURING OPEN HEART SURGERY. A SHOCK WAS ABLE TO BE GENERATED USING INTERNAL PADDLES AND THE PATIENT RECOVERED NORMALLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11202222 ↗
Other Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive) devices
- Tempus LS-MANUAL 3.940589Schiller AG · Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive)4 recalls34 deaths391 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010011100123010Zoll Medical Corporation · PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE)1 death247 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010511100123010Zoll Medical Corporation · PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE)77 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010011100103011Zoll Medical Corporation · PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE)48 reports
- Medi-Trace Cadence 22550RCardinal Health, Inc. · Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive)1 death20 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC 40010711100123010Zoll Medical Corporation · PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE)14 reports
- Medi-Trace Cadence 22770PCCardinal Health, Inc. · Pacemaker, Cardiac, External Transcutaneous (Non-Invasive)11 reports
- M SERIES BIPHASIC 60010011100123010Zoll Medical Corporation · PACEMAKER, CARDIAC, EXTERNAL TRANSCUTANEOUS (NON-INVASIVE)9 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page