Skip to content

AH PLUS ROOTCANAL 60620110Recalls & reported problems

Dentsply De Trey GmbH · AH Plus Refill Kit is a two-component paste/paste root canal sealer based on epoxy-amine resin. AH Plus Root Canal Sealer in tubes for manual mixing of Paste A + B (D010K3018020 and D010K3018030). With its supporting accessory (Mixing Pad) it can be classified as a convenience kit. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI D010606201101), received between Oct 23, 2023 and Nov 26, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient-Device Incompatibility2
  • Lack of Effect1
  • Material Too Soft/Flexible1

Patient problems

  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction2
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Lack of Effect; Lack of Effect

    IN THIS EVENT IT IS REPORTED THAT AH PLUS EXPORT 3ML CHINA THAT WAS USED IN A ROOT CANAL TREATMENT IN DECEMBER OF 2023 AND NO ABNORMALITIES WERE REPORTED. IN AUGUST OF 2024 THE PATIENT CAME INTO THE HOSPITAL AND REPORTED EXPERIENCING PAIN IN THEIR TEETH. THE DOCTOR FOUND PERIAPICAL PERIODONTITIS, SECONDARY CARIES AND TOOTH DEFECTS. ANOTHER ROOT CANAL WAS DONE ON THE SAME TOOTH. THE PATIENT CURRENTLY HAS NO ABNORMALITIES. A PATIENT REPORTEDLY PRESENTED PAIN ON AN ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TOOTH SEVEN MONTHS AFTER TREATMENT. THEY HAD TO UNDERGO ENDODONTIC RETREATMENT, WHICH LED TO IMPROVEMENT IN SYMPTOMS. THE EVENT DESCRIPTION SUGGESTS A FAILURE OF THE ENDODONTIC TREATMENT, WHICH IS A COMMON COMPLICATION OF ENDODONTIC TREATMENT AND NOT NECESSARILY RELATED TO THE SEALER.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 20783546 ↗
  • InjuryOct 4, 2024Material Too Soft/Flexible; Material Too Soft/Flexible

    IN THIS EVENT IT IS REPORTED THAT AH PLUS EXPORT 3ML CHINA, THE PASTE WAS THIN AND THE GUTTA-PERCHA POINT CANNOT SOLIDIFY AND THE ROOT CANAL BECAME INFLAMED, REQUIRING SECOND TREATMENT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20368134 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2024Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IN THIS EVENT IT IS REPORTED THAT AH PLUS EXPORT 3ML CHINA THAT WAS USED IN TREATMENT ON A PATIENT CAUSED GUM REDNESS AND SWELLING TO THE PATIENT. THE AREA WAS IMMEDIATELY RINSED WITH WATER AND REFILLED. FURTHER INFORMATION REQUESTED.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 19546849 ↗
  • InjuryOct 23, 2023Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IN THIS EVENT IT IS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF AH PLUS EXPORT 3ML CHINA IN ROOT CANAL FILLING; DURING THE FILLING PROCESS THE PATIENT REPORTED GINGIVAL ITCHING AT THE FILLING PLACE, AND THE SYMPTOMS GRADUALLY INTENSIFIED. THERE WAS NO RELIEF AFTER 5 MINUTES OF OBSERVATION. THE FILLING MATERIAL IN THE ROOT CANAL WAS REMOVED, AND THE NORMAL SALINE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE WERE WASHED ALTERNATELY. THE PATIENT REPORTED GRADUAL REMISSION OF SYMPTOMS. SUSPECTED ROOT FILLING MATERIAL ALLERGY. APPLIED FILLING MATERIAL TO THE LEFT HAND OF THE PATIENT, GRADUALLY FEEL THE ITCHING AGGRAVATED, AND THEN RINSE AWAY. ZINC OXIDE TEMPORARILY SEALED, A WEEK OF FOLLOW-UP, REPLACE WITH OTHER MATERIALS.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 17985269 ↗

Other RESIN, ROOT CANAL FILLING devices

All RESIN, ROOT CANAL FILLING devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page