AbsorbaTackRecalls & reported problems across all models

We found 4 models of AbsorbaTack by Covidien LP in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 898 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jun 19, 2017 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 63 injuries, 835 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of or Failure to Bond” (291 reports).

1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works

AbsorbaTack recalls

FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.

1. Nov 16, 2023Open, Classified

   Packaging of the device may cause a low seal strength in the side seal of the foil pouch potentially resulting in a sterile/moisture barrier breach, compromising the product sterility

   Z-0986-2024 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗

Most reported AbsorbaTack problems

AbsorbaTack models

4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.

• AbsorbaTack ABSTACK30

  STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
  1 recall455 reports
• AbsorbaTack ABSTACK15

  STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
  333 reports
• AbsorbaTack ABSTACK30X

  STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
  105 reports
• AbsorbaTack ABSTACK20S

  STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
  5 reports

Recent AbsorbaTack adverse event reports

The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Mechanical Jam

  It was reported during a procedure that the tack jammed when multiple attempts were made to fire it. Eventually, the tack fired successfully. There was no patient injury reported.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50947637 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 23, 2026Failure to Advance; Separation Problem

  It was reported that during herniorrhaphy surgery, when the tacker was used for mesh fixation, after approximately 10 minutes of use, the device began jamming and had trouble stapling. The device jammed at critical moments, and the physician was unable to secure the mesh. It was noted that some tacks were fired normally; however, the fired tacks did not penetrate or hold correctly onto the tissue. The device was replaced to resolve the issue. No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50863138 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Positioning Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Firing Problem

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50846778 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Positioning Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Firing Problem

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50846765 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Failure to Advance

  It was reported that during laparoscopic IPOM (Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh) incisional hernia repair, four tacks fired successfully but upon deployment of the fifth tack, the tack became stuck in the mesh, and the mesh tore when force was applied. The fired tacks did not penetrate tissue; however, some fired tacks held correctly onto tissue. A new tacker was used to complete the procedure. No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50836962 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 26, 2026Separation Problem

  It was reported that during laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair with mesh fixation, the device failed to secure any of the fixation points during the bilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. A new device was used to resolve the issue. No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50446296 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Positioning Failure; Failure to Advance

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50412921 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 14, 2026Failure to Advance; Separation Problem

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50251296 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Mechanical Jam

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50222367 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Failure to Advance

  According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic hernia, during tacking of the mesh, the tack did not anchor into the mesh. A new tacker was used to resolve the issue. There was no patient injury.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50220411 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 12, 2026Firing Problem; Separation Problem

  According to the reporter, in a laparoscopic hernia procedure, during mesh fixation, the tacker had a tight trigger which made the device difficult to cock. When forced, the tacks were able to penetrate the tissue but were unable to hold onto the tissue correctly and kept falling into the cavity. The tacks were retrieved. To resolve the issue, the surgeon exerted more effort in pressing the trigger to release the tacks. There was no patient injury.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50217332 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 11, 2026Positioning Failure; Display or Visual Feedback Problem

  According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, after mesh placement, when the surgeon fired the two tackers, no tacks were deployed. Upon subsequent activation, 3 to 4 tacks were released automatically. The same issue occurred repeatedly during use. There was no patient injury.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50210734 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 11, 2026Positioning Failure; Display or Visual Feedback Problem

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50210728 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 10, 2026Failure to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50191645 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 7, 2026Positioning Failure; Separation Problem

  It was reported that during a transabdominal preperitoneal approach, the operator fired several times but no tacks were fired initially. It was further reported that the tacks were eventually fired successfully and were able to penetrate the tissue, but they were unable to hold correctly onto the tissue. A new tacker was used to resolve the issue. No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50183198 ↗

Other Covidien LP products

• Endo GIA48 models · 26,277 reports · 8 recalls
• Endo GIA Ultra3 models · 15,650 reports
• Shiley387 models · 9,392 reports · 5 recalls
• Signia16 models · 8,201 reports · 6 recalls
• LigaSure32 models · 7,283 reports · 1 recall
• Tri-Staple 2.037 models · 4,892 reports · 2 recalls
• Polysorb291 models · 4,564 reports · 2 recalls
• EEA39 models · 4,432 reports · 1 recall