AbsorbaTack ABSTACK20SRecalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Fixation Device;20 Violet Absorbable Tacks · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884523006155), received between Dec 13, 2018 and May 5, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of or Failure to Bond” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of or Failure to Bond3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Misfire1
- Positioning Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Information1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 5, 2023Loss of or Failure to Bond; Positioning Failure; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Positioning Failure
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN INCISIONAL HERNIA REPAIR, IN INTRAPERITONEAL ONLAY MESH REPAIR (IPOM) PLACEMENT, AFTER FIRING APPROXIMATELY SIX TACKS, THE SURGEON FELT THAT THE TACKER WAS NOT FIRING ANYTHING. AFTER ANOTHER FIRE, THE USER REALIZED THAT THE TACKS WERE NOT PENETRATING INTO THE TISSUE. THE MESH COULD BE REMOVED FROM THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY EASILY AS THE TACKS WERE NOT FIXATED INTO THE TISSUE TO HOLD THE MESH ADEQUATELY IN PLACE. AN EXTERNAL COUNTERPRESSURE ON THE ABDOMEN WAS APPLIED WITH EACH FIRING OF THE TACKER. THE SURGEON REMOVED A FEW TACKS FROM THE MESH TO CHECK IF THE MESH COULD BE REUSED; HOWEVER, THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE RE-IMPLANTED. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A COMPETITOR MESH WAS USED WITH A NEW TACKER WITH THE SAME LOT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16877812 ↗MalfunctionDec 1, 2021Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING OPEN INCISIONAL VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR , THE DEVICE DID FIRE TO FIXATE THE MESH BUT THE TACKERS DID NOT STAY IN THE TISSUE AND FELL OUT. THE SURGEON HAD TO REMOVE THE TACKERS LAYING ON THE MESH AND ENDED UP FIXATING THE MESH WITH COMPETITOR PERMANENT SUTURES TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED FOR AN HOUR. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12909971 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2020Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN HERNIA REPAIR, ON SECURING THE MESH SOME TACKS PENETRATED THE MESH AND OTHERS DIDN¿T. THE ONES THAT FAILED TO PENETRATE WERE REMOVED. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10371189 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2020Misfire; Misfire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE MISFIRED AFTER 2 FIRINGS.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 9666415 ↗InjuryDec 13, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, APPROXIMATELY 8 DAYS POST-OPERATIVELY OF AN OPEN VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR, THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL WITH SEVERE PAIN AND WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR AN EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY. UPON OPENING THE SPACE, PUS AND INFECTION PRESENTED. MESH APPEARED TO BE INTACT AND DID NOT FAIL, BUT INFECTION WAS PRESENT. THE MESH AND TACKS HAD TO BE REMOVED. THE WOUND WAS DEBRIDED AND WOUND VAC (VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE) WAS PLACED AND THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8160337 ↗
Other STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE devices
- Endo GIA EGIA60AMTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE19 deaths10,680 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUSTNDCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE5 deaths9,730 reports
- Signia SIGPHANDLECovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 recall3 deaths5,356 reports
- ECHELON FLEX PSEE60AEthicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 recall13 deaths3,294 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUSHORTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2 deaths3,011 reports
- Endo GIA EGIA45AMTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE10 deaths2,965 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUXLCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2,909 reports
- ENDOPATH ATS45Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2 deaths2,046 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page