Endo ClipRecalls & reported problems across all models
Covidien LP · 4 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1,183
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 78
- Recalls
- 0
We found 4 models of Endo Clip by Covidien LP in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 1,183 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Apr 12, 2016 and Sep 22, 2026 — classified as 1 death, 78 injuries, 1,104 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanics Altered” (655 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Endo Clip problems
Device problems
- Mechanics Altered655
- Mechanical Problem313
- Material Deformation114
- Detachment of Device or Device Component91
- Difficult to Open or Close90
- Break55
- Device Slipped50
- Fail-Safe Problem42
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions531
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient254
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient244
- Insufficient Information73
- No Code Available36
- No Patient Involvement31
- No Information25
- Tissue Breakdown18
Endo Clip models
4 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Endo Clip 176625CLIP, IMPLANTABLE1 death768 reports
- Endo Clip 176620CLIP, IMPLANTABLE254 reports
- Endo Clip 176615CLIP, IMPLANTABLE127 reports
- Endo Clip 176619CLIP, IMPLANTABLE34 reports
Recent Endo Clip adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 22, 2026Mechanics Altered
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50860261 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2026Mechanical Problem
It was reported that during a laparoscopic procedure, while being used to apply clips to the cystic duct, the clips became deformed during attempted clipping despite no excessive force reportedly being applied by the surgeon, and the issue recurred during severalattempts. The surgeon was able to squeeze the handle. A different product was used to complete the procedure. No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50841071 ↗MalfunctionAug 28, 2026Difficult to Open or Close
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50498843 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
According to the reporter, the knob fell off. There was no patient injury.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50486708 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2026Mechanics Altered
It was reported that the device experienced delayed deployment.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50470230 ↗MalfunctionJul 28, 2026Mechanics Altered
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50061270 ↗MalfunctionJul 20, 2026Mechanics Altered
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25874972 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2026Mechanics Altered; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING CLIPPING OF THE CYSTIC ARTERY, THE HANDLE OF THE CLIP APPLIER WAS NOT SQUEEZED, AND THE INITIAL FIRING FAILED TO DEPLOY A CLIP. UPON REPEAT ACTIVATION, THE FIRING MECHANISM ADVANCED WITHOUT DEPLOYING A CLIP, RESULTING IN TRANSECTION OF THE CYSTIC ARTERY AND SIGNIFICANT BLEEDING. ATTEMPTS TO FIRE THE CLIP APPLIER OUTSIDE THE PATIENT ALSO FAILED TO DEPLOY ANY CLIPS. THE MALFUNCTION CAUSED SIGNIFICANT BLOOD LOSS AND MASSIVE HEMORRHAGE, PROMPTED A CODE PROTOCOL, AND RESULTED IN THE PATIENT BEING ADMITTED TO THE ICU. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL WITH NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS IN HOSPITAL AND HAS BEEN DISCHARGED HOME.
Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
MAUDE report 25850113 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2026Mechanics Altered
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE DEFECTIVE CLIP APPLIER MISFIRED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25827898 ↗MalfunctionJul 6, 2026Mechanics Altered
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER DURING A PROCEDURE, AFTER REPEATED FIRING OF THE CLIPS, THE DEVICE COULD NO LONGER DEPLOY THE CLIPS IN THE LATER STAGE OF USE. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 25727446 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2026Mechanical Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTROTOMY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE HAD AN UNKNOWN ISSUE. A NEW PRODUCT WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. MEDTRONIC'S INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE INCIDENT DEVICE FOUND THAT THE JAWS WOULD NOT CLOSE AND THE LOADING TRIGGER COULD NOT BE ACTUATED
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25513691 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2026Mechanical Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY OF A GALLBLADDER PROCEDURE, THE CLIPS WERE CLOSING AT A DIAGONAL ANGLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25328040 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2026Mechanical Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, INTRA-OPERATIVELY OF A GALLBLADDER PROCEDURE, THE CLIPS WERE CLOSING AT A DIAGONAL ANGLE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25327955 ↗MalfunctionApr 14, 2026Mechanics Altered
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, ON THE STAGE OF EXTRACTING THE GALLBLADDER, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO SQUEEZE THE HANDLE AND USAGE WAS DISCONTINUED BECAUSE THE CLIP WAS MISALIGNED DURING FIRING. THE MISALIGNED CLIP WAS COLLECTED AND THERE WAS NO PROBLEMS WITH THE NEW CLIP. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24872238 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Difficult to Open or Close
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24781749 ↗
Other Covidien LP products
- Endo GIA48 models · 26,277 reports · 8 recalls
- Endo GIA Ultra3 models · 15,650 reports
- Shiley387 models · 9,392 reports · 5 recalls
- Signia16 models · 8,201 reports · 6 recalls
- LigaSure32 models · 7,283 reports · 1 recall
- Tri-Staple 2.037 models · 4,892 reports · 2 recalls
- Polysorb291 models · 4,564 reports · 2 recalls
- EEA39 models · 4,432 reports · 1 recall
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page