JuggerKnotRecalls & reported problems across all models
Riverpoint Medical, LLC · 16 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 89
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls
- 0
We found 16 models of JuggerKnot by Riverpoint Medical, LLC in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 89 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jan 31, 2022 and Sep 17, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 85 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (15 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported JuggerKnot problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated15
- Fracture15
- Patient Device Interaction Problem8
- Break7
- Material Integrity Problem5
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem4
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Material Fragmentation3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions80
- Foreign Body In Patient5
- Unspecified Infection4
- Insufficient Information1
JuggerKnot models
16 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- JuggerKnot CM-99115BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue18 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99145BRNFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue13 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99114BNFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue10 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99114BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue8 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99129BNFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue7 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99529BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue7 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99115Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue6 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99215Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue5 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99629BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue4 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99129BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue2 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99229BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue2 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99329BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue2 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99429BFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue2 reports
- JuggerKnot CM-99114Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue1 report
- JuggerKnot CM-99114BTFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue1 report
- JuggerKnot CM-99229BTFastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue1 report
Recent JuggerKnot adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Material Integrity Problem
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50810779 ↗MalfunctionJun 30, 2026Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE FOREIGN SUBSTANCE WHICH LOOKS LIKE A HAIR WAS FOUND INSIDE OF THE STERILE PACKAGE WHEN THE NURSE OPENED THE OUTER PACKAGE. THEREFORE, THE NURSE PREPARED A BACK UP PRODUCT FOR THE SURGERY. THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT IS UNOPENED PRODUCT.".
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25669819 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2026Material Integrity Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, IT WAS FOUND THAT SOMETHING LIKE A PIECE OF WIRE IS REMAINING INSIDE OF THE PATIENT'S BODY BY X-RAY AFTER THE SURGERY(PLEASE REFER TO AN ATTACHED PHOTO FOR DETAILS). THE SURGEON AND THE NURSE COULDN'T BE IDENTIFY WHAT THE OBJECT IS. AND ALL OF THE PRODUCT'S WHICH WERE USED FOR THE SURGERY DISCARDED IN THE HOSPITAL. NOW, THERE IS NO PLANS FOR REOPERATION."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24259297 ↗MalfunctionSep 11, 2025Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF INSERTER OF THIS COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S DEVICE WAS FRACTURED DURING USE. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED WITHOUT REMOVING THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY, AND IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY BY X-RAY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23027138 ↗MalfunctionJul 8, 2025Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THE INSERTER OF THIS COMPLAINT PRODUCT WAS FRACTURED WHILE THE SURGEON TRIED TO IMPLANT THE ANCHOR INTO THE PATIENT'S BURR HOLE, AND THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. BY THE WAY, THE SURGEON MADE AN ADDITIONAL BURR HOLE AND USED A BACK UP OF THE SAME PRODUCT FOR THE SURGERY AND FINISHED IT."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22438219 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2025Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S INSERTER WAS FRACTURED DURING USE. AND THE SURGEON FINISHED THE SURGERY WITHOUT REMOVING THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER, SO THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22243325 ↗MalfunctionJan 30, 2025Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "THE TIP OF THE 1 PRODUCT'S INSERTER(LOT: 23120524) WAS FRACTURED, AND THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER REMAINS IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21277512 ↗MalfunctionDec 4, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S INSERTER WAS FRACTURED WHILE THE SURGEON TRIED TO INSERT THE ANCHOR INTO THE PATIENT' BURR HOLE, AND THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. AND THE ANCHOR COULDN'T BE IMPLANTED. THE ABOVE SAME INCIDENT OCCURRED ON THE 2 SAME PRODUCTS. THEREFORE, THE SURGEON USED A BACK UP ANOTHER PRODUCT FOR THE SURGERY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20847459 ↗MalfunctionDec 4, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S INSERTER WAS FRACTURED WHILE THE SURGEON TRIED TO INSERT THE ANCHOR INTO THE PATIENT BURR HOLE, AND THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY. AND THE ANCHOR COULDN'T BE IMPLANTED. THE ABOVE SAME INCIDENT OCCURRED ON THE 2 SAME PRODUCTS. THEREFORE, THE SURGEON USED A BACK UP ANOTHER PRODUCT FOR THE SURGERY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20846833 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THIS COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S INSERTER WAS FRACTURED DURING USE. AND THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED WITHOUT REMOVING THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER, SO IT HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20789711 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE TIP OF THE COMPLAINT PRODUCT'S INSERTER WAS FRACTURED DURING USE, AND THE ANCHOR COULDN'T BE IMPLANTED. SO, THE SURGEON MADE ANOTHER BURR HOLE AND IMPLANTED A BACK UP OF THE SAME PRODUCT'S ANCHOR INTO IT. THE SURGERY WAS FINISHED WITHOUT REMOVING THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER, SO IT HAS BEEN REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20788820 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "THE TIP OF INSERTER WAS FRACTURED DURING USE AND THE SURGEON DECIDED TO FINISHED THE SURGERY WITHOUT REMOVING THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY, SO IT HAS BE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20658849 ↗MalfunctionAug 5, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "THE TIP OF INSERTER WAS FRACTURED DURING USE, AND THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER HAS BEEN REMAINING IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19912342 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, TIP OF THE INSERTER WAS FRACTURED WHILE THE SURGEON TRIED TO IMPLANT THE ANCHOR INTO THE PATIENT'S BURR HOLE. FORTUNATELY, THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER COULD BE REMOVED, SO THERE IS NO REMAINS IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19305124 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2024Fracture; Fracture
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, "IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY, THE INSERTER OF THIS COMPLAINT PRODUCT COULDN'T BE PULLED OUT AFTER THE SURGEON INSERTED THE ANCHOR INTO THE PATIENT'S BURR HOLE. AND THE SURGEON PULLED THE INSERTER TO PULL IT OUT FROM THE PATIENT'S BURR HOLE, THEN TIP OF THE INSERTER WAS FRACTURED AND REMAINING IN THE PATIENT'S BURR HOLE. FORTUNATELY, THE FRACTURED PIECE OF INSERTER COULD BE REMOVED, SO THERE IS NO REMAINS IN THE PATIENT'S BODY."
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19303199 ↗
Other Riverpoint Medical, LLC products
All Riverpoint Medical, LLC devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page