MEDPORRecalls & reported problems across all models
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · 25 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 49
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 33
- Recalls
- 0
We found 25 models of MEDPOR by Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 49 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 30, 2018 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 33 injuries, 16 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size” (15 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported MEDPOR problems
Device problems
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size15
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem12
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection6
- Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Device Damaged Prior to Receipt by User2
- Fracture2
- Patient Device Interaction Problem2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions25
- Unspecified Infection13
- Insufficient Information3
- No Code Available3
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
- Cerebral Edema2
- Meningitis2
- No Information2
MEDPOR models
25 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- MEDPOR 5444-0-310PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL6 reports
- MEDPOR 82007PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL4 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-0-510PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL4 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-0-410PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL4 reports
- MEDPOR 80010PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL3 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-0-110PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL3 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-4-310PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL3 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-4-410PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL3 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-0-610PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL2 reports
- MEDPOR 5444-4-210PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL2 reports
- MEDPOR 6317PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 6327PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 8320PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 9526PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 9553PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 9859PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 80008PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 80012PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 86010PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 5444-1-310PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 5444-5-410PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 5444-4-610PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 5444-4-710PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 5444-0-710PROSTHESIS, CHIN, INTERNAL1 report
- MEDPOR 6648APPARATUS, SUCTION, SINGLE PATIENT USE, PORTABLE, NONPOWERED1 report
Recent MEDPOR adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 29, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
It was reported that after implantation of a custom MEDPOR orbital recon implant, an infection was observed requiring a revision surgery.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50931985 ↗InjurySep 29, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
It was reported that after implantation of a custom MEDPOR orbital recon implant, an infection was observed requiring a revision surgery.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50931983 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25827700 ↗MalfunctionJun 2, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON SAW A GAP AND WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE IMPLANT FIT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25359785 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLES USED TO FIX THE MUSCLES IN PLACE COULD NOT BE INSERTED THROUGH THE DESIGNATED OPENINGS, AS THE OPENINGS WERE TOO NARROW AND THE SUTURE CHANNELS WERE NOT CONTINUOUS. THE SURGEON WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY SIGNIFICANT FORCE TO PENETRATE THE SPECIFIED SUTURE CHANNELS, WHICH RESULTED IN THE NEEDLE DEVIATING LATERALLY DURING THE PROCEDURE AND CAUSING AN INJURY TO THE SURGEON. NO SURGICAL DELAY OR ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED AT INTAKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24728330 ↗MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLES USED TO FIX THE MUSCLES IN PLACE COULD NOT BE INSERTED THROUGH THE DESIGNATED OPENINGS, AS THE OPENINGS WERE TOO NARROW AND THE SUTURE CHANNELS WERE NOT CONTINUOUS. THE SURGEON WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY SIGNIFICANT FORCE TO PENETRATE THE SPECIFIED SUTURE CHANNELS, WHICH RESULTED IN THE NEEDLE DEVIATING LATERALLY DURING THE PROCEDURE AND CAUSING AN INJURY TO THE SURGEON. NO SURGICAL DELAY OR ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED AT INTAKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24728275 ↗MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLES USED TO FIX THE MUSCLES IN PLACE COULD NOT BE INSERTED THROUGH THE DESIGNATED OPENINGS, AS THE OPENINGS WERE TOO NARROW AND THE SUTURE CHANNELS WERE NOT CONTINUOUS. THE SURGEON WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY SIGNIFICANT FORCE TO PENETRATE THE SPECIFIED SUTURE CHANNELS, WHICH RESULTED IN THE NEEDLE DEVIATING LATERALLY DURING THE PROCEDURE AND CAUSING AN INJURY TO THE SURGEON. NO SURGICAL DELAY OR ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED AT INTAKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24727522 ↗MalfunctionMar 30, 2026Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLES USED TO FIX THE MUSCLES IN PLACE COULD NOT BE INSERTED THROUGH THE DESIGNATED OPENINGS, AS THE OPENINGS WERE TOO NARROW AND THE SUTURE CHANNELS WERE NOT CONTINUOUS. THE SURGEON WAS REQUIRED TO APPLY SIGNIFICANT FORCE TO PENETRATE THE SPECIFIED SUTURE CHANNELS, WHICH RESULTED IN THE NEEDLE DEVIATING LATERALLY DURING THE PROCEDURE AND CAUSING AN INJURY TO THE SURGEON. NO SURGICAL DELAY OR ANY MEDICAL INTERVENTION WERE REPORTED AT INTAKE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24727397 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY THAT LEAKED FROM THEIR EYE. DURING THE INVESTIGATION OF THE INFECTION, PART OF THE IMPLANT HAD TO BE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24638121 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY THAT LEAKED FROM THEIR EYE. DURING THE INVESTIGATION OF THE INFECTION, PART OF THE IMPLANT HAD TO BE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 24638120 ↗MalfunctionMar 4, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER SIZING, THE CORRESPONDING IMPLANT WAS OPENED BUT DID NOT FIT. ANOTHER IMPLANT OF THE SAME SIZE WAS OPENED AND USED INSTEAD.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24510798 ↗MalfunctionMar 3, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT MODEL DID NOT ACCURATELY REPRESENT THE PATIENT¿S REMAINING BONE, RESULTING IN A TWO-HOUR EXTENSION OF THE CASE DUE TO IMPROPER IMPLANT FIT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24497658 ↗InjuryDec 23, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
NO NEW INFORMATION.
Patient problems: Deformity/ Disfigurement; Unspecified Mental, Emotional or Behavioral Problem
MAUDE report 23882172 ↗MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
NO NEW INFORMATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23838769 ↗
Other Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG products
All Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page