MEDPOR TITANRecalls & reported problems across all models
Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG · 5 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls
- 1
We found 5 models of MEDPOR TITAN by Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 6 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jun 22, 2018 and Mar 18, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (1 report).
1 FDA recall record name at least one of these models by its device identifier.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
MEDPOR TITAN recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- Dec 29, 2021Terminated
Inside the packaging of one reported item a non-conforming product was found. Contrary to the design, the barrier layer was manufactured on the inferior side of the implant versus the superior side.
Z-0715-2022 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported MEDPOR TITAN problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Component Missing1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Patient-Device Incompatibility1
Patient problems
- Insufficient Information2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Code Available1
- Pain1
- Unspecified Infection1
- Visual Impairment1
MEDPOR TITAN models
5 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- MEDPOR TITAN 81032Mesh, surgical1 recall1 report
- MEDPOR TITAN 81033Mesh, surgical2 reports
- MEDPOR TITAN 81024Mesh, surgical1 report
- MEDPOR TITAN 81029Mesh, surgical1 report
- MEDPOR TITAN 81042PLATE, BONE1 report
Recent MEDPOR TITAN adverse event reports
The 6 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 18, 2026Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ORBITAL FLOOR IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO CONCERNS THAT THE IMPLANT MAY HAVE BEEN IMPEDING MUSCLE FUNCTION.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24626617 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2025Component Missing; Component Missing
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE DISTRIBUTOR THAT THE PACKAGING WAS FOUND EMPTY UPON OPENING AND THE NURSE OPENED ANOTHER PACK TO COMPLETE THE CASE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23512830 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND INSISTED ON HAVING THE IMPLANT REMOVED. SURGEON PERFORMED THE SECOND SURGERY TO REMOVE THE IMPLANT AND NOTED THERE APPEARED TO BE NO ISSUES WITH THE IMPLANT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 16770292 ↗InjuryFeb 15, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED DUE TO SOFT TISSUE COMPLICATIONS. ADDITIONALLY, THE PATIENT HAD ACQUIRED AN INFECTION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8343213 ↗InjuryJan 10, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED BY A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE THAT AFTER AN INITIAL SURGERY WAS COMPLETED A REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE TO REMOVE AN IMPLANT. NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION AND NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED WITH THE REVISION SURGERY, WHICH WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A DELAY.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8237067 ↗InjuryJun 22, 2018Patient-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ORBITAL FLOOR PLATE HAD TO BE REMOVED BECAUSE THE PATIENT STARTED TO EXPERIENCE DOUBLE VISION FOLLOWING THE SURGERY.
Patient problems: Visual Impairment
MAUDE report 7629641 ↗
Other Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG products
All Stryker Leibinger GmbH & Co. KG devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page