Padlock Clip Pro-SelectRecalls & reported problems across all models
US Endoscopy · 2 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 21
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls
- 0
We found 2 models of Padlock Clip Pro-Select by US Endoscopy in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 21 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jan 3, 2018 and Jul 1, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 19 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Fire” (11 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Padlock Clip Pro-Select problems
Device problems
- Failure to Fire11
- Detachment of Device or Device Component4
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem2
- Difficult to Remove2
- Material Protrusion/Extrusion2
- Positioning Failure2
- Failure to Advance1
- Inadequate User Interface1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions12
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient5
- Perforation2
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Padlock Clip Pro-Select models
2 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Padlock Clip Pro-Select C913131Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract14 reports
- Padlock Clip Pro-Select C913131Hemostatic metal clip for the GI tract7 reports
Recent Padlock Clip Pro-Select adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 1, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE TWO PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEMS DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH TTS CLIPS. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22375142 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22375122 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE TWO PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22375121 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22375119 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22342868 ↗MalfunctionJun 25, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22328822 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM WAS UNABLE TO DEPLOY THE CLIP. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22321245 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY THE CLIP. A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORT OF INJURY OR PROCEDURE DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22321233 ↗MalfunctionApr 30, 2025Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP WOULD NOT DEPLOY. ADDITIONALLY, USER FACILITY PERSONNEL USED A PADLOCK CIP PRO SELECT WHICH WOULD NOT DEPLOY RESULTING IN THE CANCELLATION OF THE PROCEDURE. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21937979 ↗InjuryFeb 4, 2025Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE HOUSING OF THEIR PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT CAME OFF THE SCOPE. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED AS THE DOCTOR ATTEMPTED TO CUT THE CATHETER OF THE PADLOCK AND REMOVE THE PADLOCK CHAMBER FROM THE PATIENT WITH AN OVERTUBE. THE OUTER DIAMETER OF THE PADLOCK WAS TOO LARGE TO GO THROUGH THE OVERTUBE. THE DOCTOR REMOVED THE OVERTUBE AND THEN ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE PADLOCK FROM THE PATIENT AGAIN, WHICH CAUSED A PERFORATION. THE PROCEDURE WAS DELAYED AS THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A HIGHER LEVEL OF CARE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE AND TREATMENT OF THE PERFORATION.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 21306805 ↗MalfunctionJun 26, 2024Failure to Fire; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Positioning Problem; Failure to Fire; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Positioning Problem
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DID NOT FULLY DEPLOY INTO THE TISSUE. THE CLIP WAS RELEASED INTO THE LUMEN OF THE PATIENT AND WAS THEN RETRIEVED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A SECOND PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19617712 ↗MalfunctionJul 3, 2023Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE THE PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM DID NOT DEPLOY. FACILITY PERSONNEL UTILIZED A DIFFERENT CLIP TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE RESULTING IN AN APPROXIMATELY 20 MINUTE DELAY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY, NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17246448 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2023Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED VIA MEDWATCH REPORT (B)(4) THAT DURING A PATIENT PROCEDURE WHILE WITHDRAWING THEIR SCOPE AFTER PADLOCK CLIP DEPLOYMENT, THE CAP DETACHED. THE CAP WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. NO REPORT OF INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17138031 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE USER FACILITY REPORTED THAT THE HOUSING COMPONENT OF A PADLOCK CLIP PRO-SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE DEVICE BECAME DETACHED FROM THE ENDOSCOPE FOLLOWING USE TO CLOSE A DEFECT IN THE CECUM. THE ENDOSCOPE WAS RE-INSERTED TO ATTEMPT RECOVERY OF THE COMPONENT, AND A PERFORATION WAS OBSERVED IN THE SIGMOID. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO SURGERY TO REPAIR THE PERFORATION AND RETRIEVE THE DETACHED COMPONENT. THE PATIENT IS REPORTED TO BE STABLE AND RECOVERING FROM SURGERY.
Patient problems: Perforation
MAUDE report 10692699 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2019Material Protrusion/Extrusion
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED THAT DURING INTUBATION OF AN ENDOSCOPE WITH A PADLOCK CLIP PRO SELECT DEFECT CLOSURE SYSTEM ATTACHED, THE USER NOTED BLOOD IN THE ESOPHAGUS AND WITHDREW THE ENDOSCOPE. UPON WITHDRAWAL OF THE DEVICE, THE USER NOTED THE POINTS OF THE CLIP WERE PROTRUDING PAST THE DEPLOYMENT HOUSING. THE PROCEDURE WAS STOPPED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT AND WAS COMPLETED AT A LATER DATE WITH ANOTHER PADLOCK CLIP DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9492147 ↗
Other US Endoscopy products
All US Endoscopy devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page