Prodisc LRecalls & reported problems across all models
Centinel Spine, LLC · 16 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 145
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 124
- Recalls
- 0
We found 16 models of Prodisc L by Centinel Spine, LLC in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 145 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jan 28, 2020 and Jun 5, 2026 — classified as 124 injuries, 21 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (24 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported Prodisc L problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem35
- Migration24
- Malposition of Device21
- Expulsion17
- Osseointegration Problem16
- Migration or Expulsion of Device13
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated9
- Patient Device Interaction Problem9
Patient problems
- Pain30
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions25
- Insufficient Information14
- Neuropathy12
- Bone Fracture(s)10
- Inadequate Pain Relief9
- Limb Pain9
- Vertebral Fracture9
Prodisc L models
16 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Prodisc L PDL-M-PT10SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc32 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-SP03SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc20 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-SP03SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc13 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-IP00SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc12 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-IP03SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc12 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-PT10SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc11 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-IP08SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc7 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-SP06SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc6 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-SP11SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc6 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-IP03SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc6 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-IP08SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc6 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-SP06SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc5 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-PT12SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc3 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-IP00SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc2 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-L-SP11SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc2 reports
- Prodisc L PDL-M-PT12SProsthesis, Intervertebral Disc2 reports
Recent Prodisc L adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 5, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH TWO PRODISC L DEVICES AT L4-5 AND L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED ONE OF THE DEVICES OFF OF MIDLINE BUT THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE OKAY. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING LEG PAIN. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED.
Patient problems: Limb Pain
MAUDE report 25407545 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH TWO PRODISC L DEVICES AT L4-5 AND L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED ONE OF THE DEVICES OFF OF MIDLINE, BUT THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE OKAY. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING LEG PAIN. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED.
Patient problems: Limb Pain
MAUDE report 25407544 ↗InjuryJun 5, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH TWO PRODISC L DEVICES AT L4-5 AND L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED ONE OF THE DEVICES OFF OF MIDLINE BUT THOUGHT THAT IT WOULD BE OKAY. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING LEG PAIN. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED.
Patient problems: Limb Pain
MAUDE report 25407543 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device
A PATIENT (47YO, MALE) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L IMPLANT AT LEVEL L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2025. THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC FOR THEIR 6 MONTH FOLLOW UP AND IMAGING WAS COMPLETED. ALTHOUGH NO ACUTE INJURY OCCURRED AND PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, THE IMAGINING SHOWED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD EXPULSED FROM THE VERTEBRAL BODIES. A REMOVAL HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25124502 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device
A PATIENT (47-YEAR-OLD, MALE) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L IMPLANT AT LEVEL L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2025. THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC FOR THEIR 6 MONTH FOLLOW UP AND IMAGING WAS COMPLETED. ALTHOUGH NO ACUTE INJURY OCCURRED AND PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, THE IMAGINING SHOWED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD EXPULSED FROM THE VERTEBRAL BODIES. A REMOVAL HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25124409 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2026Migration or Expulsion of Device
A PATIENT (47YO, MALE) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L IMPLANT AT LEVEL L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2025. THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THE CLINIC FOR THEIR 6 MONTH FOLLOW UP AND IMAGING WAS COMPLETED. ALTHOUGH NO ACUTE INJURY OCCURRED AND PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC, THE IMAGINING SHOWED THAT THE IMPLANT HAD EXPULSED FROM THE VERTEBRAL BODIES. A REMOVAL HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2026.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25124246 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Osseointegration Problem
A MALE PATIENT WITH DISEASE OF THE SPINAL CORD AND SECONDARY SCOLIOSIS WAS IMPLANTED WITH PRODISC DISCS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS IN SEVERAL SURGERIES. IMPLANTATION INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THE DISC AT L5-S1 WAS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED AND CONVERTED TO FUSION WHICH FAILED, ADDITIONALLY THE L4-5 POSTERIOR FUSION FAILED. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS AND PAIN. DUE TO POOR BONE QUALITY, ADEQUATE FIXATION OF THE PRODISC L DEVICES AT LEVELS L2-3 AND L3-4 WAS NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026 THE IMPLANTS AT THOSE LEVELS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALIF CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy; Pain
MAUDE report 24931570 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Osseointegration Problem
A MALE PATIENT WITH DISEASE OF THE SPINAL CORD AND SECONDARY SCOLIOSIS WAS IMPLANTED WITH PRODISC DISCS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS IN SEVERAL SURGERIES. IMPLANTATION INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THE DISC AT L5-S1 WAS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED AND CONVERTED TO FUSION WHICH FAILED, ADDITIONALLY THE L4-5 POSTERIOR FUSION FAILED. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS AND PAIN. DUE TO POOR BONE QUALITY, ADEQUATE FIXATION OF THE PRODISC L DEVICES AT LEVELS L2-3 AND L3-4 WAS NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026 THE IMPLANTS AT THOSE LEVELS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALIF CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy; Pain
MAUDE report 24931189 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Osseointegration Problem
A MALE PATIENT WITH DISEASE OF THE SPINAL CORD AND SECONDARY SCOLIOSIS WAS IMPLANTED WITH PRODISC DISCS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS IN SEVERAL SURGERIES. IMPLANTATION INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THE DISC AT L5-S1 WAS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED AND CONVERTED TO FUSION WHICH FAILED, ADDITIONALLY THE L4-5 POSTERIOR FUSION FAILED. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS AND PAIN. DUE TO POOR BONE QUALITY, ADEQUATE FIXATION OF THE PRODISC L DEVICES AT LEVELS L2-3 AND L3-4 WAS NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026 THE IMPLANTS AT THOSE LEVELS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALIF CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy; Pain
MAUDE report 24931182 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2026Osseointegration Problem
A MALE PATIENT WITH DISEASE OF THE SPINAL CORD AND SECONDARY SCOLIOSIS WAS IMPLANTED WITH PRODISC DISCS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS IN SEVERAL SURGERIES. IMPLANTATION INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THE DISC AT L5-S1 WAS PREVIOUSLY REMOVED AND CONVERTED TO FUSION WHICH FAILED, ADDITIONALLY THE L4-5 POSTERIOR FUSION FAILED. THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL SYMPTOMS AND PAIN. DUE TO POOR BONE QUALITY, ADEQUATE FIXATION OF THE PRODISC L DEVICES AT LEVELS L2-3 AND L3-4 WAS NOT ACHIEVED. ON (B)(6) 2026 THE IMPLANTS AT THOSE LEVELS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ALIF CAGES.
Patient problems: Neuropathy; Pain
MAUDE report 24931172 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L DEVICE AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PATIENT FELT TIPPED FORWARD AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS KYPHOTIC. A REVISION WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE SUPERIOR ENDPLATE WAS REPOSITIONED A LITTLE DEEPER WHICH SEEMED TO CORRECT THE KYPHOSIS.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 24690326 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L DEVICE AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PATIENT FELT TIPPED FORWARD AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS KYPHOTIC. A REVISION WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE SUPERIOR ENDPLATE WAS REPOSITIONED A LITTLE DEEPER WHICH SEEMED TO CORRECT THE KYPHOSIS.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 24690322 ↗InjuryMar 25, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L DEVICE AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2026. THE PATIENT FELT TIPPED FORWARD AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS KYPHOTIC. A REVISION WAS COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2026 AND THE SUPERIOR ENDPLATE WAS REPOSITIONED A LITTLE DEEPER WHICH SEEMED TO CORRECT THE KYPHOSIS.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available
MAUDE report 24690311 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT (FEMALE, 42 YEARS) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L DEVICE AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2025. AFTER IMPLANTATION SURGERY THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL ISSUES AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS OFF OF MIDLINE BY 1.5 MM. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2025 AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED WITH A CAGE AND PLATE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Nervous System Problem
MAUDE report 24036141 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2026Malposition of Device
A PATIENT (FEMALE, 42 YEARS) WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L DEVICE AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2025. AFTER IMPLANTATION SURGERY THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING NEUROLOGICAL ISSUES AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS OFF OF MIDLINE BY 1.5 MM. THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2025 AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED WITH A CAGE AND PLATE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Nervous System Problem
MAUDE report 24035789 ↗
Other Centinel Spine, LLC products
All Centinel Spine, LLC devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page