STALIF CRecalls & reported problems across all models
Centinel Spine, LLC · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 23
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 23
- Recalls
- 0
We found 3 models of STALIF C by Centinel Spine, LLC in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 23 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Aug 6, 2019 and May 24, 2021 — classified as 23 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Most reported STALIF C problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem17
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
- Insufficient Device Problem Information6
- Loss of Osseointegration6
Patient problems
- Bone Fracture(s)9
- Neck Pain8
- Foreign Body Sensation in Eye6
- Malunion of Bone6
- Pain6
- Swollen Glands6
- Spinal Column Injury2
STALIF C models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- STALIF C ABS1440Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical9 reports
- STALIF C ABS1540Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical8 reports
- STALIF C ABS1340Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical6 reports
Recent STALIF C adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869832 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869831 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869830 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869829 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869828 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869827 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869826 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869823 ↗InjuryMay 24, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A PATIENT RECEIVED 3 LEVELS OF STALIF C-TI INTERBODY CAGES AND ABO SCREWS AT C3/4, C5/6, AND C6/7 ON (B)(6) 2021. ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A COLLAPSED C6 VERTEBRAE IDENTIFIED VIA LATERAL X-RAY. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A C6 CORPECTOMY BY REMOVAL OF 2 OF THE 3 STALIF C-TI CAGES.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 11869821 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271975 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271973 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271972 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271971 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271969 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271965 ↗
Other Centinel Spine, LLC products
All Centinel Spine, LLC devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page