ReliamaxRecalls & reported problems across all models
Covidien LP · 7 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 63
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls
- 0
We found 7 models of Reliamax by Covidien LP in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 63 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jul 10, 2017 and May 18, 2022 — classified as 1 death, 9 injuries, 53 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Fire” (19 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Most reported Reliamax problems
Device problems
- Failure to Fire19
- Detachment of Device or Device Component13
- Failure to Form Staple11
- Break10
- Misfire8
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
- Fail-Safe Problem4
- Component or Accessory Incompatibility2
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient19
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient18
- No Code Available12
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions11
- No Patient Involvement6
- Failure to Anastomose5
- No Information2
- Death1
Reliamax models
7 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- Reliamax GIA8038RLSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 death32 reports
- Reliamax GIA6038RLSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE13 reports
- Reliamax GIA6048RLSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE7 reports
- Reliamax GIA8048RLSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE5 reports
- Reliamax GIA60RSSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE3 reports
- Reliamax GIA80RSSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2 reports
- Reliamax GIA6025RLSTAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 report
Recent Reliamax adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 18, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fail-Safe Problem; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fail-Safe Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN GASTRECTOMY, WHILE RESECTING THE STOMACH, A COMPONENT OF THE DEVICE DISENGAGED. THE WHITE INTERLOCK POP UP BEFORE LOADING INTO THE DEVICE. TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, A NEW RELOAD WAS USED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14432223 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2022Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE. THE BLACK PUSHER THUMB PIECE CANNOT BE MOVED AT ALL. THE LOADING UNIT WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE CASE AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13168935 ↗MalfunctionAug 18, 2021Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Protective Measures Problem; Component or Accessory Incompatibility; Protective Measures Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN HEMICOLECTOMY PROCEDURE, BEFORE LOADING THE RELOAD, IT WAS FOUND OUT THAT THE BLADE WAS ALREADY OUT. THERE WAS DIFFICULTY IN LOADING AND THE USER COULD NOT JOIN THE TWO HALVES OF THE STAPLER. A NEW RELOAD WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12338693 ↗MalfunctionJul 5, 2021Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY, UPON MAKING POUCH OF STOMACH, THE PUSHING KNOB OF BOTH DOWN LOADING UNIT BROKE. SURGEON WAS NOT ABLE TO DO ARTICULATION AND FOUND LOOSE END OF FAN AT JOINT PART. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12119330 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2021Break; Expulsion; Break; Expulsion
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY, ON FIRST RELOAD, THE BLUE PART AND WHITE ATTACHING END OF THE RELOAD WAS BROKEN. WHILE ON THE SECOND RELOAD, STAPLES PIN WAS ALREADY OUT AND COULD NOT FIRE. ON THIRD RELOAD, THE WHITE SAFETY LOCK WAS OUT, AND IT COULD NOT FIRE THE STAPLER. ANOTHER RELOAD WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11458148 ↗InjuryJan 5, 2021Failure to Form Staple; Failure to Form Staple
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A HEMICOLECTOMY, THERE WAS POOR STAPLE FORMATION, THE STAPLE LINE WAS INCOMPLETE, THE USER OVERSEWED TO FIX THE ISSUE. ANOTHER CARTRIDGE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 11115230 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2020Misfire; Misfire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING FIRING OF DEVICE ON TRANSVERSE COLON IN A HEMICOLECTOMY, ONE RELOAD FIRED PARTIALLY AND THE OTHER RELOAD GOT BROKEN. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE RELOAD TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11076566 ↗MalfunctionDec 28, 2020Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING FIRING OF DEVICE ON TRANSVERSE COLON IN A HEMICOLECTOMY, ONE RELOAD FIRED PARTIALLY AND THE OTHER RELOAD GOT BROKEN. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE RELOAD TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11076532 ↗MalfunctionNov 9, 2020Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN HEMICOLECTOMY, WHILE PERFORMING COLON TRANSECTION, THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE, AND THE FIRING KNOB WAS STUCK. A NEW RELOAD WAS USED TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE AND COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10808870 ↗MalfunctionOct 29, 2020Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, WHEN PREPARING FOR AN OPEN COLECTOMY, THE BLACK PUSHER THUMB PIECE COULD NOT BE MOVED AT ALL AND THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE. ANOTHER RELOAD WAS USED.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; No Information
MAUDE report 10756076 ↗MalfunctionSep 30, 2020Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THE RELOAD'S FIRING KNOB WAS BROKEN AND DISENGAGED WHILE TAKING IT OUT OF THE BOX. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10605273 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON AN OPEN ANTERIOR RESECTION, DURING RESECTION, A PART OF THE RELOAD DISENGAGED. ANOTHER RELOAD WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10365278 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2020Failure to Fire; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Failure to Fire; Detachment of Device or Device Component
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN LAPAROTOMY WITH ILEOSTOMY PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE. THE BLACK KNOB COULD NOT MOVE AHEAD AND WHEN FORCE WAS APPLIED THE BLACK KNOB BROKE OFF. THE SURGEON THEN USED ANOTHER DEVICE LOADING TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10323770 ↗MalfunctionJul 17, 2020Break; Break
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, PRIOR TO USE, THE LOADING UNIT WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10292728 ↗MalfunctionJul 17, 2020Misfire; Misfire
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON AN OPEN ESOPHAGECTOMY, WHILE MAKING THE POUCH IN THE STOMACH, THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO FIRE HALF THE DEVICE AND NEEDED TO WITHDRAW DUE TO NOT BEING ABLE TO STAPLE FURTHER. ANOTHER DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Information
MAUDE report 10291407 ↗
Other Covidien LP products
- Endo GIA48 models · 26,277 reports · 8 recalls
- Endo GIA Ultra3 models · 15,650 reports
- Shiley387 models · 9,392 reports · 5 recalls
- Signia16 models · 8,201 reports · 6 recalls
- LigaSure32 models · 7,283 reports · 1 recall
- Tri-Staple 2.037 models · 4,892 reports · 2 recalls
- Polysorb291 models · 4,564 reports · 2 recalls
- EEA39 models · 4,432 reports · 1 recall
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page