Skip to content

Reliamax GIA8048RLRecalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Gastrointestinal Anastomosis Reload · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Reliamax (7)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20884521168647), received between Jul 10, 2017 and Jan 5, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Fire” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Fire2
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Failure to Form Staple1
  • Mechanics Altered1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Code Available2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 5, 2022Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN GASTROINTESTINAL ANASTOMOSIS PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE. THE BLACK PUSHER THUMB PIECE CANNOT BE MOVED AT ALL. THE LOADING UNIT WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE CASE AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13168935 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2020Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, ON AN OPEN ANTERIOR RESECTION, DURING RESECTION, A PART OF THE RELOAD DISENGAGED. ANOTHER RELOAD WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10365278 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2019Failure to Fire; Failure to Fire

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A RIGHT HEMICOLECTOMY, DURING TRANSECTION OF COLON, THE DEVICE DID NOT FIRE. THEY OPENED ANOTHER R ELOAD TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8632390 ↗
  • InjurySep 24, 2018Failure to Form Staple; Failure to Form Staple

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING AN OPEN TRIPLE BYPASS AND SPECIMEN WAS TAKEN FROM THE PANCREATIC HEAD, THERE WAS A POOR STAPLE FORMATION AND BLEEDING FROM THE STAPLE LINE. THE STAPLE LINE WAS FIXED THRU OVER SEWING IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED BY MORE THAN 30 MINUTES.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7902242 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 10, 2017Mechanics Altered; Mechanics Altered

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER: OCCURRED DURING AN OPEN PARTIAL GASTRECTOMY. DURING THE DUODENAL STUMP AND STOMACH RESECTIONING, THE STAPLES DID NOT DEPLOY FROM THE LOADING UNITS. THERE WAS SURGICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED BECAUSE THE TISSUE HAD TO BE HAND SUTURED. THERE WAS NO EXTENSION IN SURGICAL TIME.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6697730 ↗

Other STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE devices

All STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page