STALIF C ABS1340Recalls & reported problems
Centinel Spine, LLC · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00815101029009), received between Feb 3, 2021 and Feb 3, 2021 — classified as 6 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
- Loss of Osseointegration6
Patient problems
- Malunion of Bone6
- Neck Pain6
- Pain6
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271975 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271973 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271972 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271971 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271969 ↗InjuryFeb 3, 2021Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration; Failure to Osseointegrate; Loss of Osseointegration
A PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION AND REMOVAL OF A 2-LEVEL STALIF C FLX AND STALIF C ABO SCREW CONSTRUCT AT C4/5 AND C5/6 DUE TO PSEUDOARTHROSIS (NON-UNION), SUBSIDENCE, SEGMENTAL KYPHOSIS, RADICULAR PAIN, AND OTHER UNINDICATED COMPLICATIONS. THE PATIENT HAD THE STALIF C FLX CONSTRUCT REPLACED WITH A CORTICAL RING AND ANTERIOR PLATE. THE REMOVAL WENT WELL AND GOOD SAGITTAL BALANCE WAS RESTORED. THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A DEVICE MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: Malunion of Bone; Neck Pain; Pain
MAUDE report 11271965 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Integrated Fixation, Cervical devices
- NA 03.617.902Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical103 reports
- NA 03.617.900Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical77 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626525Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical75 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626526Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical49 reports
- NA 03.617.905Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical29 reports
- NA 03.617.904Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical27 reports
- Divergence® Anterior Cervical Fusion System G6626746Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical21 reports
- NA 03.647.972Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with integrated fixation, cervical17 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page