UltraCor TwirlRecalls & reported problems across all models
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 20
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls
- 0
We found 3 models of UltraCor Twirl by Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 20 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Dec 19, 2017 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 13 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported UltraCor Twirl problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Break3
- Difficult to Remove3
- Material Twisted/Bent3
- Separation Failure3
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material2
- Material Discolored2
- Patient-Device Incompatibility2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions10
- No Patient Involvement3
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction2
- Reaction2
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Blood Loss1
- Pain1
- Rash1
UltraCor Twirl models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- ULTRACOR TWIRL UCTW17MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE18 reports
- UltraCor™ Twirl™ UCLS17MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE1 report
- UltraCor™ Twirl™ UCVR17MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE1 report
Recent UltraCor Twirl adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Component Missing; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a breast tissue marker placement procedure using an UltraCor Twirl Curls Marker. Prior to the procedure, a healthcare professional identified that one unit was missing the cap from the needle tip. In addition, a tear was observed on the back of the outer packaging. There was no patient contact.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50943203 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a breast biopsy procedure using an UltraCor Twirl Breast Tissue Marker. Following marker placement, it was reported that the patient experienced an adverse tissue reaction. The patient subsequently developed a rash, which began later on the evening of the procedure and progressively spread beyond the breast area. The patient also reported generalized itching radiating from the breast to other areas of the body. Medical intervention was sought, and steroid therapy was prescribed by the treating physician. The patient additionally used homeopathic creams, diphenhydramine (Benadryl), and loratadine (Claritin); however, these measures reportedly provided limited symptom relief. The patient reported a history of a few food allergies but no other relevant allergies were identified. The patient's current status is unknown.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Rash
MAUDE report 25251202 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Break
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a breast tissue marker placement procedure using the UltraCor Twirl Clover Marker. During the procedure, the Twirl Clover marker split into two pieces. There was no reported patient injury.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25158270 ↗MalfunctionFeb 10, 2026Break
ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST MARKER PROCEDURE BY USING ULTRACOR TWIRL BREAST TISSUE MARKER. IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST PROCEDURE MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGING SHOWED THAT THE MARKER WAS ALLEGEDLY FRAGMENTED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24301763 ↗MalfunctionSep 26, 2025Positioning Failure; Difficult to Remove; Separation Failure; Positioning Failure; Difficult to Remove; Separation Failure
ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE THROUGH NORMAL DENSITY TISSUE USING THE ULTRACOR TWIRL BREAST TISSUE MARKER. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE CLIP DID NOT DETACH FROM THE INSERTION DEVICE AFTER DEPLOYMENT. IT REMAINED ATTACHED AT THE TIP AND PULLED THROUGH BREAST TISSUE DURING REMOVAL, CAUSING SIGNIFICANT PAIN. THE CLIP ENDED UP APPROXIMATELY 2 CM FROM THE BIOPSY SITE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT PRESSURE REQUIRED TO DEPRESS THE PLUNGER. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN AND DISTRESS DUE TO THE DRAGGING. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23152111 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2024Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THERE WAS A HAIR ALLEGEDLY FOUND INSIDE THE PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20785149 ↗MalfunctionMay 14, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE MARKER WAS ALLEGEDLY BROKEN AND CAUSED BITS OF NITINOL TO BE SHAVED OFF THE MARKER DURING ASPIRATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19307494 ↗MalfunctionMay 15, 2023Premature Activation; Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping; Premature Activation; Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ULTRASOUND GUIDED BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE WAS ALLEGEDLY IN THE UNLOCK POSITION WHEN THE NEEDLE WAS STILL IN THE PACKAGE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE MARKER WAS STILL USED ON PATIENT AND MADE DIFFICULT TO KNOW IF THE MARKER WAS IN THE NEEDLE AS IF IT WAS ALREADY UNLOCKED. NO COAXIAL WAS USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16929312 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED GIANT MAMMARY URTICARIA. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THE ADDITIONAL MEDICATION WAS PROVIDED AND THE CLIPS WERE NOT REMOVED YET. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 16321609 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT POST BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED GIANT MAMMARY URTICARIA. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THE ADDITIONAL MEDICATION WAS PROVIDED AND THE CLIPS WERE NOT REMOVED YET. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 16321547 ↗MalfunctionFeb 7, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST TISSUE MARKER PLACEMENT, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ALLERGIES AND RASHES. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16316197 ↗MalfunctionJun 8, 2022Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Separation Failure; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Separation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A VACUUM ASSISTED BREAST BIOPSY PROCEDURE, THE MARKER ALLEGEDLY GOT STUCK IN THE PROBE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE MARKER WAS NEAR TO THE SURFACE OF THE SKIN AND CAUSED SOME PAIN. REPORTEDLY, THE PROBE WAS REMOVED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14629986 ↗InjuryFeb 9, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS ALLEGEDLY HAD MORE PAIN WHEN INSERTING A MARKER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 13496462 ↗MalfunctionMay 11, 2021Difficult to Remove; Separation Failure; Material Twisted/Bent; Difficult to Remove; Separation Failure; Material Twisted/Bent
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BREAST MARKER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11806673 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2020Material Discolored; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Discolored; Material Twisted/Bent
THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES ONE MALFUNCTION. A REVIEW OF THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT MODEL UCTW17 BIOPSY INSTRUMENT ALLEGEDLY EXPERIENCED BENT NEEDLE. THIS INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM ONE SOURCE. THIS EVENT DID INVOLVE PATIENT WITH NO REPORTED PATIENT CONTACT. THE PATIENT'S AGE AND WEIGHT WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10282990 ↗
Other Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. products
- MAX-CORE11 models · 8,845 reports · 1 recall
- DENALI Vena Cava Filter2 models · 1,021 reports
- MAGNUM19 models · 571 reports · 1 recall
- Conquest32 models · 560 reports
- Ultraverse RX56 models · 536 reports
- Fluency Endovascular Stent Graft51 models · 532 reports
- Atlas Gold33 models · 427 reports
- Ultraverse 035 PTA Dilatation Catheter92 models · 393 reports
Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page